Loading…
Order of the Concho County countywide justice court adopting a youth diversion plan under Code of Criminal Procedure chapter 45, subchapter E: objective, applicability and eligibility; diversion strategies and prohibited strategies; the diversion agreement; intermediate diversion and diversion by the judge; referral to court; the $50 administrative fee and its waiver; and confidentiality and automatic expunction of diversion records.
Texas > Seventh Administrative Judicial Region > Concho County > Justice of the Peace (Countywide).
IN THE JUSTICE COURT COUNTYWIDE CONCHO COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER ADOPTING A YOUTH DIVERSION PLAN IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article 45.306 (b) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure that the Court adopts the Youth Diversion Plan hereafter referred to as the “Concho County Justice of the Peace Countywide Youth Diversion Plan” or “Diversion Plan”. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plan shall not limit the
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-25 (AJR-7 Seventh Region build, own-site layer) from BenchPath custody ajr7 corpus sources/documents/8ca17b9008c97c38-order-adopting-youth-diversion-plan.pdf (335,396 bytes, sha256 8ca17b9008c97c387560f470d746964a282016d17c5fca9829120ee4f1c7b462; 5 page(s)) - the document the Concho County website posts (https://www.co.concho.tx.us/upload/page/6118/JP%20order_12132024103718.PDF), not registered with the Office of Court Administration's TOPICs registry as of 2026-09-25: transcribed by eye from the rendered pages of the scanned file (no machine text relied on) and read a second time against the page images - for long documents word by word against an independent machine OCR of the same scan, every disagreement and every handwritten entry resolved on the image; signature, seal and file-stamp blocks bracketed. Signed: Signature of the justice of the peace with the court seal (no printed name), December 13, 2024.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Verified requirements for Judge Scott A. Spoonts unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →Verified the action checklist unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →