Loading…
Policies and Procedures for proceedings before Civil District Associate Judge Nicole Muñoz (captured from her county page): the seven-court assignment (14th, 68th, 116th, 162nd, 191st, 193rd, 298th District Courts), the direct-email communication protocol with mandatory copying, courtesy-copy expectations, and her strict Local Rule 2.02 TRO enforcement.
Texas > Dallas County > the civil district courts' associate-judge docket (Muñoz: 14th, 68th, 116th, 162nd, 191st, 193rd, 298th) — an officer-layer instrument; the AJ is not an OCA bench seat
ASSIGNMENT: "Judge Muñoz is assigned to support and preside over proceedings in the following District Courts: 14th … 68th … 116th … 162nd … 191st … 193rd … 298th"; the proceedings referred vary by court — settings confirmed through the underlying court's coordinator or lead clerk. COMMUNICATIONS: direct email is preferred — "she does not always receive notice of e-filed correspondence, e-filed proposed orders, or communications sent to the District Court staff"; "ALL e-mail correspondence with Judge Muñoz MUST include copying ALL opposing counsel (or pro se parties)" with the underlying court's coordinator and lead clerk encouraged; responses typically within two business days. COURTESY COPIES: encouraged always; "At the very least, please provide Judge Muñoz with courtesy copies of filings with twenty-five (25) or more pages." TROs: she "frequently hears TROs filed in the above-referenced District Courts," set through the underlying court's lead clerk; "Judge Muñoz strictly enforces Local Rule 2.02 for all TROs."
Reviewer note: Own-site officer instrument composed verbatim; the assignment list matches the dossier's officer table exactly (instrument-grade AJ truth). Note: the dossier's Muñoz row printed a 7-court list including the 298th while the county AJ index page's shorter description varies — this instrument's own list controls.
G-2026-045-SC required anyone using generative AI to disclose it on the face of the filing and add a scripted certification, on pain of striking, denial of relief or monetary penalties. Rule 2.515(d)(2) and AOSC26-12 preempted it on June 15, 2026, so it could not be enforced — and by August 16, 2026 the Seventh Circuit had removed the order from its published register (no rescission instrument appears there). BenchPath holds the hashed capture as the historical record.
3 verbatim requirements on divisional requirements in ANDREW L. SIEGEL's division.