Loading…
The five county criminal courts' standing order (SO-2023-0001, Feb. 22, 2023; Judges Lauri Ragland, Susan Piel, Forrest Beadle, Chance Oliver and Coby Waddill): when a signed Certificate of Call is filed in a misdemeanor case — the court's certification that the defendant failed to appear when the case was called — the County Clerk issues an alias capias warrant unless there is already an active warrant on the case.
Texas > Denton County > County Criminal Courts Nos. 1–5 — misdemeanor defendants who fail to appear (warrant consequence), defense counsel and the County Clerk.
"ON THIS DATE, the Presiding Judges of the County Criminal Courts of Denton County, Texas, this orders the County Clerk to issue an alias capias warrant upon the filing of a signed Certificate of Call unless there is already an active warrant on the case. ORDER ENTERED by the elected Judges of the County Criminal Courts for Denton County do hereby indicate their approval to the entry of this Standing Order on the 22nd day of February, 2023."
"ON THIS DATE, the Presiding Judges of the County Criminal Courts of Denton County, Texas, this orders the County Clerk to issue an alias capias warrant upon the filing of a signed Certificate of Call unless there is already an active warrant on the case. ORDER ENTERED by the elected Judges of the County Criminal Courts for Denton County do hereby indicate their approval to the entry of this Stand
Reviewer note: Own-site document (image-only, 1 p) read through the pypdfium2 vision lane 2026-09-06 and transcribed verbatim; signed by all five current county criminal court judges (spine: Ragland CCC1, Piel CCC2, Beadle CCC3, Oliver CCC4, Waddill CCC5). Composed as a county-level rule spanning the five courts (court-less) benchpath-ajr8-denton (own-site lane).
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.