N.D. Tex. LCrR 59.1 — Briefing Practice Concerning Objections to Magistrate Judge Orders in Nondispositive Matters: the court's own rule, verbatim from LOCAL CRIMINAL RULES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Effective September 1, 2026), official PDF, sha-custodied. Court-level requirement: applies in every case before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas alongside the federal rules and any judge-specific procedures.
(a) Brief. Objections filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(a) must be accompanied by a brief that sets forth the party’s contentions of fact and/or law, and argument and authorities, and complies with LCrR 47.2. (b) Response Brief. A response brief to objections filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(a) must comply with LCrR 47.2 and be filed within 14 days from the date the objections are filed. (c) Reply Brief. Reply briefs may not be filed unless the moving party requests, and the presiding judge grants, leave to do so. If leave is granted, the reply brief shall be filed no later than the deadline set by the presiding judge and comply with LCrR 47.2. (d) Preparing the Record. A party who files objections under Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(a) is responsible for preparing the record and – if necessary for disposition of the objections – obtaining a hearing transcript. Unless otherwise directed by the presiding judge, the transcript must be filed contemporaneously with the objections.
(a) Brief. Objections filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(a) must be accompanied by a brief that sets forth the party’s contentions of fact and/or law, and argument and authorities, and complies with LCrR 47.2. (b) Response Brief. A response brief to objections filed under Fed. R. Cr