Loading…
Justice of the Peace, Precinct 4 — Order Adopting a Youth Diversion Plan — Galveston County. The operative requirements are quoted verbatim from the governing document (registered/posted 2024-12-23); the document in custody is the controlling text.
Texas > Galveston County > Justice Court, Precinct 4
IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article 45.306(b) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure that the Court adopts the Youth Diversion Plan (hereafter the 'Galveston County Justice of the Peace, Precinct 4 Youth Diversion Program'). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Program shall not limit the types of strategies or services that may be imposed as needed in the best interest of the child and to promote the long-term safety of the community; strategies and services may be tailored to an individual case as determined by the Judge, Prosecutor and Youth Diversion Coordinator after assessment and collaboration with all interested parties and service providers. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the procedures, components and applicable law referenced in the Program shall be maintained on file for public inspection.
Reviewer note: Operative provisions transcribed verbatim by vision-read of the posted scanned order (170 dpi, read this session); the posted document (sha256 7b8809237612…) is the controlling text. Signed by Kathleen M. McCumber, Justice of the Peace, Precinct 4 (signed and entered December 23, 2024) under the Texas Youth Diversion and Early Intervention Act (HB 3186).
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.