Loading…
Probate Court Administrative Order 2020-5 (Prohibiting the Recording of Remote Court Proceedings) — Galveston County. The operative requirements are quoted verbatim from the governing document (registered/posted 01/01/2023); the document in custody is the controlling text.
Texas > Galveston County > Probate Court
PROBATE COURT OF GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2020-5 Administrative Order Prohibiting the Recording of Remote Court Proceedings In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, state and local Executive Orders, and the Emergency Orders of the Texas Supreme Court, the Probate Court has implemented procedures for remote hearings requiring the use of electronic programing such as Zoom and/or YouTube. The Court finds it essential that the only recording of any proceeding shall be that of the official Court Reporter. The Court finds that the recording of any court proceeding, whether in the courtroom or via remote access,· without permission shall be strictly prohibited. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that it is strictly prohibited for any individual other than the official Court Reporter to records in any manner a Probate Court proceeding, whether in the courtroom or via remote access, and whether by active participants or public viewers. Any violation of this Order may result in a finding of contempt of court. Signed: April 27, 2020. JUDGE PRESIDING FILED 2020 APR 27 AM 11:44 Dwight D. Sullivan County Clerk Galveston County, Texas
Reviewer note: Complete document text quoted verbatim (whitespace-normalized); the registered document (sha256 e09d42207ca1…) is the controlling custody copy. Text recomposed 2026-09-08 (Phase 3b): OCR/extractor artifacts corrected verbatim against the official print; wording unchanged.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.