Loading…
Standing order of the 106th District Court exempting all parties in tax lawsuits filed in Garza County under Property Tax Code Chapters 31-34 from the automatic (initial) disclosures of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 194; a party served with discovery requests in such a suit must still respond to them timely.
Texas > Seventh Administrative Judicial Region > Garza County > 106th District Court.
106th DISTRICT COURT’S STANDING ORDER REGARDING MANDATORY DISCLOSURES IN TAX CASES FILED IN GARZA COUNTY, TEXAS The Court notes that Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 194.1(a) provides: Duty to Disclose. Except as exempted by Rule 194.2(d) or as otherwise agreed by the parties or ordered by the court, a party must, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties the information or material described in Rule 194.2, 194.3, and 194.4. That provision establishes a method for this Court to enter this Standing Order to waive the application of Rule 194 in specific circumstances. After due consideration and in order to maximize judicial efficiency and economy, this Court is of the opinion that tax cases filed in Garza County under Texas Property Tax Code Chapters 31-34 should be exempt from the mandatory disclosure requirements set out in Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 194, but further notes that any party in a tax lawsuit under Texas Property Tax Code Chapters 31-34, that is duly served discovery requests by the opposing party, will still be fully and completely obligated to timely respond to any such party initiated discovery requests. It is: ORDERED that all parties in tax lawsuits filed in Garza County, Texas under Texas Property Tax Code Chapters 31-34 in the 106th District Court are exempt from the automatic disclosure rules set out in Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 194. SIGNED AND ENTERED this 5th day of July, 2022 [the printed ", 2021" after the blank is struck through]. [signature] REED FILLEY, PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE 106th DISTRICT COURT
106th DISTRICT COURT’S STANDING ORDER REGARDING MANDATORY DISCLOSURES IN TAX CASES FILED IN GARZA COUNTY, TEXAS The Court notes that Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 194.1(a) provides: Duty to Disclose. Except as exempted by Rule 194.2(d) or as otherwise agreed by the parties or ordered by the court, a party must, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties the information or
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-24 (AJR-7 Seventh Region build) from BenchPath custody sources/documents/8c1ae5b23646c4fd-standing-order-rule-194.pdf (application/pdf, 195958 bytes, sha256 8c1ae5b23646c4fd58c3ac18b2567b8d37ef128770c5302125bb252f768db8bb; 1 pages) - the TOPICs-registered document: the digital text layer, assembled from glyph geometry with a character-stream proof, and every page read against the rendered PDF; signature, seal and file-stamp blocks bracketed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.