Loading…
One-paragraph standing order of the two Hunt County district courts: an attorney ad litem for a child in a case where the Department of Family and Protective Services seeks termination is discharged from further duties upon entry of a final order of termination as to the last parent for whom termination is sought.
Texas > Tenth Administrative Judicial Region > Hunt County > the 196th and 354th District Courts. Applies in cases in which the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services seeks termination of parental rights.
[File stamp: FILED AT ______ M, JUN 16 2015, [signature], CLERK DISTRICT COURT, HUNT CO., TX] § IN THE DISTRICT COURTS § HUNT COUNTY, TEXAS STANDING ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Attorneys Ad Litem for children in cases in which the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services is seeking termination of the rights of a parent or parents of the child are and shall be discharged from any further duties in the case upon the entry of a final order of termination of the last parent for whom termination is sought. SIGNED on this the 16 [handwritten] day of June, 2015. [signature] Hon. Richard A. Beacom, 354th Judicial District Court [signature] Hon. J. Andrew Bench, 196th Judicial District Court [Running footer: STANDING ORDER, Page Solo]
[File stamp: FILED AT ______ M, JUN 16 2015, [signature], CLERK DISTRICT COURT, HUNT CO., TX] § IN THE DISTRICT COURTS § HUNT COUNTY, TEXAS STANDING ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Attorneys Ad Litem for children in cases in which the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services is seeking termination of the rights of a parent or parents of the child are and shall be discharged from any furt
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-19 (AJR-10 Tenth Region build) from BenchPath custody sources/registered/1494.pdf (application/pdf, 33800 bytes, sha256 78977357fd671394e64a9b7e855eebee275fee27a0144fa777ba6bba481e8116; 1 pages) - the TOPICs-registered document: transcribed by eye from the rendered pages of the scanned PDF (no text layer in the file was relied on), machine OCR draft corrected page by page; signature and file-stamp blocks bracketed. One-page scan read by eye; typed from the page. The day '16' is handwritten. The file stamp is set diagonally across the caption. The later Standing Order in Cases Involving Child Protective Services (April 2, 2024, TOPICs 1884) does not address the discharge of attorneys ad litem. Also posted on the county's own website: https://www.huntcounty.net/upload/page/0114/docs/Standing%20Order-Ad%20Litem.pdf (23,431 bytes, sha256 27fa656fd88652e6...; the same signed order with the file stamp of June 16, 2015, posted on the District Clerk and District Courts pages - read 2026-09-20). [TRANSCRIBED BY EYE 2026-09-21 (corpus-0920 P12): every page of the registered file (sha256 78977357fd67..., 1 page(s), digital layer that failed the machine checks; text taken from the layer and corrected word by word from the page) read against the rendered file; verbatim, source typos kept, stamps/signatures bracketed; the earlier abstract replaced by the full instrument; confidence high. benchpath-tx-corpus0920-p12-2026-09-21]
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.