Loading…
A standing order of the 271st Judicial District Court (Wise and Jack Counties) allowing a delinquent-tax suit to be placed on the inactive list when the taxing entity's attorney notifies the court in writing that the parties have entered a written payment plan.
Applies to delinquent-tax suits before the 271st Judicial District Court in Jack County. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
The 271st Judicial District Court of Wise and Jack Counties, Standing Order Re: Inactivating Tax Suits with Payment Letter for Plaintiff's Attorney (signed July 15, 2025). The court finds that in civil suits where a governmental taxing agency seeks to collect delinquent taxes on real property, the agency and the property owner may enter written agreements to abate or pause the suit and give the owner an opportunity to pay under a payment plan instead of foreclosing. It is therefore ordered that in a delinquent-tax suit in the Jack or Wise County District Court, upon written notification by the attorney representing the taxing entity that the parties have entered a written payment plan, the suit shall be inactivated and shall remain inactive until dismissed by the governmental taxing agency or foreclosure proceedings have resumed.
The 271st Judicial District Court of Wise and Jack Counties, Standing Order Re: Inactivating Tax Suits with Payment Letter for Plaintiff's Attorney (signed July 15, 2025). The court finds that in civil suits where a governmental taxing agency seeks to collect delinquent taxes on real property, the agency and the property owner may enter written agreements to abate or pause the suit and give the ow
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-06 from the TOPICs custody scan (read in full via the vision lane). 271st District Court order for Wise and Jack Counties; composed on the Jack 271st District Court row.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.