Loading…
Judge Santini's single-document procedure governing all motions to compel discovery in the 457th District Court, decided on the submission docket: the movant contacts the court (936-538-3697) for a submission date and serves notice per the county district-court local rules (Rule 3.7 subparts B/C, where not inconsistent); the motion sets out each disputed request BY ITS PROPOUNDED NUMBER with the request, each objection, and each answer/response quoted VERBATIM, followed immediately by succinct argument and authority for why each objection should be overruled or each response is deficient; the motion is e-filed and e-served with a Notice of Submission, and a Word/WordPerfect copy is emailed to the respondent; a proposed order restating each disputed request with space for the court's rulings is e-filed and emailed (named "[Case Number] - Proposed Order - [Party] Motion to Compel") to david.kallus@mctx.org; the respondent's response answers each discrete objection/response with argument and authority and is e-filed/e-served plus emailed to the movant; the movant may add a succinct reply beneath each response. The written discovery itself is NOT attached (except the specific highlighted page needed to prove a misquote). A no-response motion needs only a simple motion stating the service dates plus a simple proposed order. Oral-deposition compel motions follow the same steps using deposition page/line references instead of request numbers.
Texas > Montgomery County > 457th District Court (Judge Vincenzo J. Santini) — all motions to compel discovery. Supplements the county district-court local rules (Rule 3.7). TOPICs doc 100 (text) and image-only twin doc 93 are the same instrument.
Reviewer note: Text-layer registration (doc 100) read in full and quoted verbatim; image-only twin doc 93 folded as a duplicate. The registration carries no execution date on the text layer (signature line blank); effective_date left null (verify against the signed print if ever material). Composed benchpath-ajr2-p2.
Tenth (10th) Court of Appeals — Standing Order No. 1, as registered in the statewide TOPICs local-rules registry (posted 01/01/2023). The operative requirements are quoted verbatim; the registered document is the controlling text.
Tenth (10th) Court of Appeals — Standing Order No. 2, as registered in the statewide TOPICs local-rules registry (posted 01/01/2023). The operative requirements are quoted verbatim; the registered document is the controlling text.
Verified requirements for Judge Vince Santini unlocks with a free account — 7 premium judge reports in your first 30 days, then $29 per report or Professional.
Unlock free →Verified the action checklist unlocks with a free account — 7 premium judge reports in your first 30 days, then $29 per report or Professional.
Unlock free →