Loading…
Judge Scharlene W. Valdez's adoption of the same generative-AI standing order text for County Court at Law No. 6: attorneys and self-represented litigants who use generative AI (the order names Google Gemini, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Anthropic Claude, and AI-assisted research like Lexis+ and Westlaw Precision) in work product, research, or drafting MUST include a prescribed VERBATIM verification IN BOLD — swearing under penalty of perjury which AI programs were used, that the filer reviewed the ENTIRE pleading, that it contains no misstatements of law, misrepresented holdings, or improper citations, that it contains no sensitive or confidential information, and that no attached evidence was created, edited, enhanced, or altered by generative AI. A pleading using generative AI WITHOUT the verbatim bold verification WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. The order separately prohibits: filing pleadings that misstate law, misrepresent holdings, or cite non-existent cases; entering any case participant's sensitive, confidential information into a generative AI program; filing pleadings containing such information; offering evidence created/edited/enhanced/altered by generative AI in any contested hearing (oral or submission) or trial; using interpreters that rely on voice-recognition AI for document translation or live testimony; and using experts who rely on generative AI in their methodology or opinion formation. Violations draw a duly noticed show-cause hearing with all lawful sanctions on the table — expressly including death-penalty sanctions — plus possible orders to produce ALL invoices and time logs for the pleading (fraudulent-billing check), a requirement to attach highlighted copies of all cited case law to future pleadings, and referrals to disciplinary authorities (CPRC ch. 10, TRCP 13, Penal Code §§ 37.02, 37.09 grounds recited). The court binds itself too: no generative AI in drafting orders or on county equipment.
Texas > Montgomery County > County Court at Law No. 6 (Judge Scharlene W. Valdez) — all attorneys and self-represented litigants filing in this court. One of three same-window Montgomery generative-AI standing orders (this registration; doc 2906's district-court edition; doc 2909's county-court-tier edition); the probate court's separate AI order (doc 2911) was rescinded by doc 2921 on April 7, 2026.
Reviewer note: Image-only registration (five pages) read through the vision lane; the body is the common Montgomery generative-AI order text (verified against the 457th text-layer edition page-for-page; first and signature pages read in full), signed by Judge Scharlene W. Valdez for County Court at Law No. 6 on April 1, 2026. Composed benchpath-ajr2-p2.
Tenth (10th) Court of Appeals — Standing Order No. 1, as registered in the statewide TOPICs local-rules registry (posted 01/01/2023). The operative requirements are quoted verbatim; the registered document is the controlling text.
Tenth (10th) Court of Appeals — Standing Order No. 2, as registered in the statewide TOPICs local-rules registry (posted 01/01/2023). The operative requirements are quoted verbatim; the registered document is the controlling text.
Verified requirements for Judge Scharlene W. Valdez unlocks with a free account — 7 premium judge reports in your first 30 days, then $29 per report or Professional.
Unlock free →Verified the action checklist unlocks with a free account — 7 premium judge reports in your first 30 days, then $29 per report or Professional.
Unlock free →