Loading…
The Orange County district courts’ (128th/163rd/260th) standing order implementing CCP art. 17.027 (SB6): a defendant charged with a felony committed while on bail for another felony in the same county may be released on bail only by the court where the earlier case is pending, or a court it designates — and this order designates the Justices of the Peace for Precincts 1–4 to magistrate and set bail for such defendants.
Texas > Orange County > district courts and justices of the peace — bail for felony-on-bail defendants.
IN THE DISTRICT COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS 128TH, 163RD, AND 260TH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS STANDING ORDER REGARDING SB6 Release On Bail Of Defendant Charged With Felony Offense Committed While On Bail The District Courts of Orange County, Texas, 128th, 163rd, and 260th Judicial Districts (hereinafter jointly referred to as "the Courts") find and order as follows: The Courts find that the Legislature has recently made significant changes to the statutes regarding bail for Defendants in Texas. The Courts further find it necessary to prepare and sign this order to comply with said statutes and continue the bail bonding procedures for Orange County, Texas Pursuant to Article 17.027 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, if a defendant is charged with committing an offense punishable as a felony while released on bail in a pending case for another offense punishable as a felony and the subsequent offense was committed in the same county as the previous offense, the defendant may be released on bail only by: (A) the court before whom the case for the previous offense is pending; or (B) another court designated in writing by the court described by Paragraph (A). It is hereby ORDERED that pursuant to subsection (B) above, the Justices of the Peace for Orange County Precincts One, Two, Three, and Four may magistrate and set bail for defendants described in the above cited Article. This order is the Courts designation in writing as stated in (B) above. Signed the 5th [handwritten] day of April, 2022. [signature] Judge Courtney Arkeen, 128th District Court [signature] Judge Rex Peveto, 163rd District Court [signature] Judge Steve Parkhurst, 260th District Court
IN THE DISTRICT COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS 128TH, 163RD, AND 260TH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS STANDING ORDER REGARDING SB6 Release On Bail Of Defendant Charged With Felony Offense Committed While On Bail The District Courts of Orange County, Texas, 128th, 163rd, and 260th Judicial Districts (hereinafter jointly referred to as "the Courts") find and order as follows: The Courts find that the Legislatur
Reviewer note: AJR-2 East cohort (Angelina/Orange/Liberty/Chambers/Jasper/Newton). Source instrument read via text/vision lane; classified RULE under the records-vs-rules doctrine. Composed benchpath-ajr2-east. Applicability 2026-09-09 (fix program 2026-09-09, Phase 5, audit M7): specific -> universal — the row binds every court in its state/circuit/county scope and names no court, judge or division. [TRANSCRIBED BY EYE 2026-09-21 (corpus-0920 P12): every page of the registered file (sha256 d11caf52be4a..., 1 page(s), digital layer that failed the machine checks; text taken from the layer and corrected word by word from the page) read against the rendered file; verbatim, source typos kept, stamps/signatures bracketed; the earlier abstract replaced by the full instrument; confidence high. benchpath-tx-corpus0920-p12-2026-09-21]
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.