A joint standing order of the Travis County District Courts and County Courts at Law governing the use of electronic monitoring devices as a condition of bond or release in criminal cases.
Applies to electronic monitoring as a condition of bond or release in criminal cases before the Travis County District and County courts. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
[Running header: DocuSign Envelope ID: 1744D69A-1686-4BC1-A4DA-58EF0AB8CE05] Cause No. D-1-GN-61-121012 Cause No. C-1-CR-11-100054 IN THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT, 167TH DISTRICT COURT, 299TH DISTRICT COURT, 331ST DISTRICT COURT, 390TH DISTRICT COURT, 403RD DISTRICT COURT, 427TH DISTRICT COURT, 450TH DISTRICT COURT, AND 460TH DISTRICT COURT FOR TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW #3, COUNTY COURT AT LAW #4, COUNTY COURT AT LAW #5, COUNTY COURT AT LAW #6, COUNTY COURT AT LAW #7, COUNTY COURT AT LAW #8, AND COUNTY COURT AT LAW #9 FOR TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS STANDING ORDER REGARDING ELECTRONIC MONITORING DEVICES The judges in the above-referenced courts in Travis County, Texas, enter the following order: 1. When individuals under the court-ordered supervision of the Travis County Community Justice Services (TCCJS) have been ordered to wear an electronic monitor and then are re-arrested in Travis County, TCCJS-Pretrial Services/Probation and the Travis County Sheriff's Office (TCSO) are ordered to remove electronic monitoring devices at the direction of TCCJS-Pretrial Services/Probation as needed while in custody. 2. This Order does not amend or suspend any original orders or bond conditions requiring supervised individuals to wear electronic monitoring devices when out of the physical custody of TCSO, and at the direction of TCCJS-Pretrial Services/Probation individuals will need to have electronic monitoring devices reinstalled if and when they are released from custody. Signed this 21st day of March, 2024. District Court Judges: [DocuSigned] Clifford Brown, Judge, 147th District Court [DocuSigned] Dayna Blazey, Judge, 167th District Court [DocuSigned] Karen Sage, Judge, 299th District Court [DocuSigned] Chantal Eldridge, Judge, 331st District Court [DocuSigned] Julie Kocurek, Judge, 390th District Court [DocuSigned] Brandy Mueller, Judge, 403rd District Court [DocuSigned] Tamara Needles, Judge, 427th District Court [DocuSigned] Brad Urrutia, Judge, 450th District Court [DocuSigned] Selena Alvarenga, Judge, 460th District Court County Court at Law Judges: [DocuSigned] Bianca Garcia, Judge, County Court at Law #3 [DocuSigned] Dimple Malhotra, Judge, County Court at Law #4 [DocuSigned] Mary Ann Espiritu, Judge, County Court at Law #5 [DocuSigned] Denise Hernández, Judge, County Court at Law #6 [DocuSigned] Elisabeth A. Earle, Judge, County Court at Law #7 [DocuSigned] Carlos H. Barrera, Judge, County Court at Law #8 [DocuSigned] Kim Williams, Judge, County Court at Law #9
[Running header: DocuSign Envelope ID: 1744D69A-1686-4BC1-A4DA-58EF0AB8CE05] Cause No. D-1-GN-61-121012 Cause No. C-1-CR-11-100054 IN THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT, 167TH DISTRICT COURT, 299TH DISTRICT COURT, 331ST DISTRICT COURT, 390TH DISTRICT COURT, 403RD DISTRICT COURT, 427TH DISTRICT COURT, 450TH DISTRICT COURT, AND 460TH DISTRICT COURT FOR TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW #3, COUNT
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-06 from the TOPICs custody scan (text layer read). Bound to Travis County (criminal). [TRANSCRIBED BY EYE 2026-09-21 (corpus-0920 P12): every page of the registered file (sha256 fbef20fbb579..., 2 page(s), digital layer that failed the machine checks; text taken from the layer and corrected word by word from the page) read against the rendered file; verbatim, source typos kept, stamps/signatures bracketed; the earlier abstract replaced by the full instrument; confidence high. benchpath-tx-corpus0920-p12-2026-09-21]
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.