Loading…
A standing order of the Travis County District Courts and County Courts at Law ordering the Sheriff's Office to make the results of any Article 16.22 mental-health evaluation available to the Court, defense attorney and prosecutor.
Applies to criminal cases in Travis County Courts at Law Nos. 3–9. The district courts entered a parallel order the same day, published separately. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
C-1-CR-11-100054 — In the County Courts at Law of Travis County, Texas (Criminal Proceedings): STANDING ORDER RELEASING REPORT MADE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 16.22, TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. The Court ORDERS the Travis County Sheriff's Office to make available to the Court, Defense Attorney and Prosecutor the results of any mental health evaluation pursuant to Art. 16.22 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Signed on the 24th day of June 2022 by Judge Dimple Malhotra (County Court #4), Judge Nancy Hohengarten (#5), Judge Brandy Mueller (#6), Judge Elisabeth Earle (#7), Judge Carlos Barrera (#8) and Judge Kim Williams (#9) (Judge John Lipscombe, County Court #3, unavailable).
Standing Order Releasing Report Made Pursuant to Article 16.22, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure (Travis County District Courts and County Courts at Law; signed June 24, 2022). The Court ORDERS the Travis County Sheriff's Office to make available to the Court, the defense attorney and the prosecutor the results of any mental-health evaluation conducted pursuant to Article 16.22 of the Texas Code o
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-06 from the TOPICs custody scan (text layer read). Registered at the district (502) and county-court (503) levels; bundled. Bound to Travis County (criminal). Unbundled 2026-09-07 (F2): the district courts' parallel order (doc 502) had been bundled here as a copy; it is a separate instrument under its own cause number and is now its own rule. This rule carries the County Courts at Law order (doc 503) only.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.