Sixth Administrative Judicial Region
Verified judges, local rules, standing orders, and controlling division-assignment orders for Brewster County, Bandera County, Crockett County, Culberson County, Edwards County, El Paso County, Gillespie County, Hudspeth County, Jeff Davis County, Kendall County, Kerr County, Kimble County, Kinney County, Mason County, McCulloch County, Medina County, Menard County, Pecos County, Presidio County, Reagan County, Real County, Sutton County, Terrell County, Upton County, Uvalde County, Val Verde County — every entry cites its official source with a last-verified date.
Official site: https://www.txcourts.gov/6ajr/
159
judicial officers
91
published rules
26
counties
0
assignment orders
Rules by category
- Standing Orders53
- Local Rules25
- Administrative Orders13
Source health (1 registered)
Counties in this circuit
Bench (159 judicial officers)
District judges
County-level judges
Justices of the peace
Associate judges, masters & magistrates
Titles shown as district judges, county-level judges (constitutional county courts, statutory county courts at law, probate courts), justices of the peace, and associate judges or masters per the Office of Court Administration roster and each court's own pages.
Recently verified rules
Search all rules →Updated Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence — 394th Judicial District Court (Culberson County)
The 394th Judicial District Court's updated standing order on artificial intelligence, applying to every pending or hereafter filed case in the 394th Judicial District Court of Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, Jeff Davis, and Presidio Counties. It warns that generative AI systems (ChatGPT, Claude, OpenAI, Bing and others) are unreliable, prone to bias, and often fabricate information, and requires every self-represented litigant and attorney who uses AI for legal research or drafting to sign and file the attached certification before using AI-generated information — certifying that all AI-created language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis were verified as accurate through traditional non-AI legal sources by a licensed human, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for noncompliance. Signed July 22, 2026, effective immediately.
Updated Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence — 394th Judicial District Court (Presidio County)
The 394th Judicial District Court's updated standing order on artificial intelligence, applying to every pending or hereafter filed case in the 394th Judicial District Court of Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, Jeff Davis, and Presidio Counties. It warns that generative AI systems (ChatGPT, Claude, OpenAI, Bing and others) are unreliable, prone to bias, and often fabricate information, and requires every self-represented litigant and attorney who uses AI for legal research or drafting to sign and file the attached certification before using AI-generated information — certifying that all AI-created language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis were verified as accurate through traditional non-AI legal sources by a licensed human, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for noncompliance. Signed July 22, 2026, effective immediately.
Standing Order on Jury-Trial Location — 38th Judicial District Court (Uvalde County), felony cases
The 38th Judicial District Court’s standing order explaining where felony trials and hearings are held in Uvalde County — either the District Courtroom of the Uvalde County Courthouse or the Justice Center Courtroom at 339 King Fisher Lane — and the court’s general preference, for reasons of acoustics, jury separation, security and jury-room access, to hold felony jury trials at the Justice Center Courtroom, with advance notice of location to the parties.
El Paso Council of Judges — Confidentiality Policy, Appendix A: Laws Governing Disclosure of Confidential Court Information
Appendix A to the El Paso Council of Judges confidentiality policy: the Rule of Judicial Administration, Code of Judicial Conduct canons, Government Code and other provisions that govern disclosure of confidential court information.
El Paso Council of Judges — Confidentiality Policy (adopted Feb. 29, 2024)
Confidentiality policy adopted by the El Paso Council of Judges under Texas Rule of Judicial Administration 7.1: the duty of confidentiality for court personnel, what information is confidential, permitted disclosures, and the consequences of a breach.
394th District Court (Hudspeth County) — Standing Order Regarding Public Access to DFPS Court Records (Hon. Roy Ferguson)
Standing order of the 394th District Court limiting public access to documents filed in suits brought by the Department of Family and Protective Services and stating who may inspect them and how.
Standing Discovery Order in All Criminal Cases — 454th District Court & Medina County Court at Law
The 454th Judicial District Court and Medina County Court at Law standing discovery order (Appendix 4) for all criminal cases: it orders the State to produce and permit inspection of statements, tangible evidence, criminal records, impeachment and extraneous-offense material, exculpatory and lab evidence, and Giglio/Napue information; orders reciprocal expert disclosure by both sides at least 45 days before trial; and sets the order’s scope, timing and continuing-duty terms under CCP 39.14.
Kerr County Court at Law — Standing Order and Fee Schedule for Compensation of Appointed Counsel in Misdemeanor Cases (June 14, 2021)
The court-published Kerr County Court at Law — Standing Order and Fee Schedule for Compensation of Appointed Counsel in Misdemeanor Cases (June 14, 2021), quoted whole from the document as posted (2 page(s)).
Kerr County Court at Law — Local Rules and Procedure for Settings and Disposition of Civil and Family Law Cases (Judge Susan F. Harris; Kerr County)
The court-published Kerr County Court at Law — Local Rules and Procedure for Settings and Disposition of Civil and Family Law Cases, quoted whole from the document as posted (1 page(s)).
Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence — Hudspeth County Court
The Hudspeth County Court's standing order on artificial intelligence, applying to every pending or hereafter filed case in Hudspeth County. It warns that generative AI systems (ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, Google Bard, TensorFlow, OpenAI, Bing and others) are unreliable, prone to bias, and often fabricate information, and requires every self-represented litigant and attorney who uses AI for legal research or drafting to sign and file the attached certification before using AI-generated information — certifying that all AI-created language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis were verified as accurate through traditional non-AI legal sources by a licensed attorney, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for noncompliance. Signed by County Judge Joanna E. MacKenzie, effective July 12, 2024.
Updated Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence — 394th Judicial District Court (Jeff Davis County)
The 394th Judicial District Court's updated standing order on artificial intelligence, applying to every pending or hereafter filed case in the 394th Judicial District Court of Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, Jeff Davis, and Presidio Counties. It warns that generative AI systems (ChatGPT, Claude, OpenAI, Bing and others) are unreliable, prone to bias, and often fabricate information, and requires every self-represented litigant and attorney who uses AI for legal research or drafting to sign and file the attached certification before using AI-generated information — certifying that all AI-created language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis were verified as accurate through traditional non-AI legal sources by a licensed human, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for noncompliance. Signed July 22, 2026, effective immediately.
Updated Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence — 394th Judicial District Court (Brewster County)
The 394th Judicial District Court's updated standing order on artificial intelligence, applying to every pending or hereafter filed case in the 394th Judicial District Court of Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, Jeff Davis, and Presidio Counties. It warns that generative AI systems (ChatGPT, Claude, OpenAI, Bing and others) are unreliable, prone to bias, and often fabricate information, and requires every self-represented litigant and attorney who uses AI for legal research or drafting to sign and file the attached certification before using AI-generated information — certifying that all AI-created language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis were verified as accurate through traditional non-AI legal sources by a licensed human, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for noncompliance. Signed July 22, 2026, effective immediately.