Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.460
MOTIONS TO CONTINUE TRIAL
Text — October 1, 2026 edition
(a) Generally. Motions to continue trial are disfavored and should rarely be granted and then only upon good cause shown. Successive continuances are highly disfavored. Lack of due diligence in preparing for trial is not grounds to continue the case. Motions for continuance based on parental leave are governed by Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.570.
(b) Motion; Requirements. A motion to continue trial must be in writing unless made at a trial and, except for good cause shown, must be signed by the named party requesting the continuance.
(c) Motion; Timing of Filing. A motion to continue trial must be filed promptly after the appearance of good cause to support such motion. Failure to promptly request a continuance may be a basis for denying the motion to continue.
(d) Motion; Contents. All motions for continuance, even if agreed, must state with specificity:
(1) the basis of the need for the continuance, including when the basis became known to the movant;
(2) whether the motion is opposed;
(3) the action and specific dates for the action that will enable the movant to be ready for trial by the proposed date, including, but not limited to, confirming the specific date any required participants such as third-party witnesses or experts are available; and
(4) the proposed date by which the case will be ready for trial and whether that date is agreed by all parties.
(e) Efforts to Avoid Continuances. To avoid continuances, trial courts should use all appropriate methods to address the issues causing delay, including requiring depositions to preserve testimony, allowing remote appearances, and resolving conflicts with other judges as provided in the Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration.
(f) Setting Trial Date. When possible, continued trial dates must be set in collaboration with attorneys and self-represented litigants as opposed to the issuance of unilateral dates by the court.
(g) Dilatory Conduct. If a continuance is granted based on the dilatory conduct of an attorney or named party, the court may impose sanctions on the attorney, the party, or both.
(h) Order on Motion for Continuance. When ruling on a motion to continue, the court must state, either on the record or in a written order, the factual basis for the ruling. An order granting a motion to continue must either set a new trial period or set a case management conference. If the trial is continued, the new trial must be set for the earliest date practicable, given the needs of the case and resources of the court. The order must reflect what further activity will or will not be permitted.
Notes and commentary — not rule text
Committee Notes
1980 Amendment. Subdivision (a), deleted by amendment, was initially adopted when trials were set at a docket sounding prescribed by statute. Even then, the rule was honored more in the breach than the observance. Trials are no longer uniformly set in that manner, and continuances are granted generally without reference to the rule. Under the revised rule, motions for continuance can be filed at any time that the need arises and need not be in writing if the parties are before the court.
1988 Amendment. The supreme court, by adopting Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.085(c), effective July 1, 1986, required all motions for continuance to be signed by the litigant requesting the continuance. The amendment conforms rule 1.460 to rule 2.085(c); but, by including an exception for good cause, it recognizes that circumstances justifying a continuance may excuse the signature of the party.
Source of truth
- Edition
- October 1, 2026 edition
- Official file
- https://www-media.floridabar.org/uploads/2026/10/Civil-Procedure-Rules-10-01-26.pdf (PDF pages 156–158)
- Text hash
- sha256 0bb4923f74d0ea5409dd1960ddaca81ddfa5ef4c3ad31e83c83283b3d6ecff34
- Composed by
- compose_book.py 2026-10-03: pypdfium2 primary, PyMuPDF check, PDF bookmarks as the inventory
BenchPath cards that rely on this text
- Broward Division 83/WA (ELLEN FELD) — Continuances
- Seventeenth Cir. — Judge Shari Africk-Olefson: Judge preferences
- 19th Cir. — Judge Jeffrey W Hendriks: Judge Hendriks Division Practices And Procedures Accessible
- Palm Beach DCM: agreed orders can extend a deadline but never the trial date — continuances need a DCM conference
- Broward Division 25 (SHARI AFRICK-OLEFSON) — Continuances
- First Cir. — Judge Kristina Lightel: Administrative orders (practice preferences)
- Palm Beach Division RC (Judge Marci Rex) — Continuances & cancellations
- Ninth Cir. — Judge Heather L. Higbee: Proposed orders
- Palm Beach Division X (Judge Scott Suskauer) — Continuances & cancellations
- 15th Cir. — Division E instructions
- Eighteenth Cir. — Judge Donna M. Goerner: Hearing & argument time
- Palm Beach Division AI (Judge G. Joseph Curley) — Continuances & cancellations
- Palm Beach Division JS (Judge Melanie Dale Surber) — Continuances & cancellations
This rule cites
Provisions in this library that the text above cites, as it prints each citation. A range cited as “ss. 61.13-61.16” links its first and last provisions.
Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration
Cited by 3 provisions
Provisions in this library whose text cites Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.460. Each shows the citation as that text prints it.
Procedural information only. Not legal advice and not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Confirm the current text with the official publisher before relying on it.