Loading…
The court rescinds its April 13, 2020 order that suspended in-person oral argument: the option to appear in person resumes as of the May 2022 oral argument calendar, and the parties may still elect to appear via CourtCall or videoconferencing; the courtroom is open to the public with limited seating (face coverings may be required) and all sessions are live-streamed on the court's website; the court reserves the authority to modify the methods for appearances (HILL, P.J.).
California > Fifth Appellate District > Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2022-3-14 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ORDER SUBSTITUTING VIDEO-CONFERENCING FOR IN-PERSON ORAL ARGUMENT On April 13, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the court filed an order titled “ORDER SUBSTITUTING VIDEO-CONFERENCING FOR IN-PERSON ORAL ARGUMENT.” At that time, we suspended all in-person oral argument sessions. Because California is moving from the pandemic phase to a new endemic phase of COVID-19, we rescind our April 13, 2020 order. The option to appear in-person for oral argument will resume as of the May 2022 oral argument calendar. In addition to in-person appearances, the parties may still elect to appear via CourtCall or videoconferencing. The courtroom will be open to the public with limited seating. The public and the parties may be required to wear face coverings in the courtroom. All sessions will continue to be live-streamed on the Fifth District Court of Appeal website. The court reserves the authority to modify the methods for appearances at oral argument, as appropriate, to address changing circumstances. HILL, P. J.
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2022-3-14 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ORDER SUBSTITUTING VIDEO-CONFERENCING FOR IN-PERSON ORAL ARGUMENT On April 13, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the court filed an order titled “ORDER SUBSTITUTING VIDEO-CONFERENCING FOR IN-PERSON ORAL ARGUMENT.” At that time, we suspended all in-person oral argument
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-10-20 (California Fifth Appellate District build 2026-10-20) from BenchPath custody ca/appellate/ca-coa-5/documents/5dca-administrative-order-2022-3-14.pdf (fetched 2026-10-20; 222955 bytes, sha256 15c1f5f761f92fc0913b336d91eb384417b23d9351e2484c532655c9ac545ff5): the file's text layer (PyMuPDF text blocks, each a paragraph; the e-filing stamp dropped). The court's Local Rules & Orders page lists the order under “Orders”. effective_date: the order's own number and the court's page date it March 14, 2022; the e-filing stamp reads “8:30 am, Mar 15, 2022”; the in-person option resumed with the May 2022 calendar.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.