Loading…
Section 10 (Rules 10.01 and 10.02): counsel to identify at the time of setting any preliminary examination expected to take a half hour or more to present (10.01); and motions to continue the preliminary examination disfavored and denied without affirmative proof under Penal Code Section 1050, a stipulation or a substitution of counsel not by itself good cause (10.02).
California > Third Appellate District > Colusa County > Superior Court of California, County of Colusa
SECTION 10 CRIMINAL RULES - PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS RULE 10.01 TIME ESTIMATES FOR PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS Counsel shall, at the time of setting, or as soon as possible thereafter, identify to the setting judge, any matter which can realistically be expected to take a half hour or more to present. Those matters not so designated will be assumed to require less than a half hour and will be appropriately calendared. (Adopted, effective 7/1/92) RULE 10.02 CONTINUANCES OF PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS Motions to continue the preliminary examination are disfavored and shall be denied unless the moving party, pursuant to and in accordance with Penal Code Section 1050 and the particular statues pertaining to continuances of preliminary examinations, presents affirmative proof that the ends of justice require a continuance. A stipulation by all parties to continue the preliminary examination does not constitute good cause, by itself. Substitution of counsel does not automatically constitute good cause for a continuance. (Adopted, effective 7/1/92)
SECTION 10 CRIMINAL RULES - PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS RULE 10.01 TIME ESTIMATES FOR PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS Counsel shall, at the time of setting, or as soon as possible thereafter, identify to the setting judge, any matter which can realistically be expected to take a half hour or more to present. Those matters not so designated will be assumed to require less than a half hour and will be appropr
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Colusa build 2026-10-12) from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-colusa/docs/local-rules-15-final.pdf (the court's rule book, its cover “COLUSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT LOCAL RULES REVISED AND EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2015”, as fetched 2026-10-12; 710456 bytes, sha256 ab900b287107469f5cc0e8af39fc1af062663a6299f9ad7ccfc166e02655e0fb; 73 pages; this section PDF page 48, printed page 36) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow): the rules (PDF pages 13 to 65, printed 1 to 53) composed as one text and cut at the sixteen section headings “SECTION 1” to “SECTION 16”, each matched once as a whole line followed by the section's title (a section may begin mid-page); the running header of every page (“COLUSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT”) and its page number (“- 1 -”), each named and a whole line in its band, removed as chrome - 106 chrome lines; lines reflowed into the rules' paragraphs, each rule's number and title (“RULE 1.07 TIMELY APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND REQUIRED NOTIFICATION”), each lettered or numbered subdivision starting a line, each section heading and each history line (“(Amended, effective ...)”, “(Adopted, effective ...)”) on a line of its own; the strike report (review/strike-report-2026-10-12.txt) finds 5 struck runs on 2 pages, spaces only (a form's underlined blanks) - the book composed without strike_out; no table on the rule pages; 19 whitespace-only fixes (build/book-fixes.json: three lines wrapped at a parenthesized letter or number the reflow took for a label rejoined - Rules 1.12(C), 15.06(A)(1) and 15.08 - and Rule 15.10's suggested form of summary of account set item by item, each label with its schedule line and “$”); the vertical-gap, short-line, page-break, bold, false-break, fragment and row audits (custody file book_extra_audits.py; review/book-extra-audits-2026-10-12.txt and review/book-audits-after-fixes-2026-10-12.txt) list candidates read one by one (build/book_fixes.py) - the rest kept as printed (the rule numbers with their titles on one row, the words of justified title rows, Rule 4.01(3)'s two-line heading, the inner labels of Rules 2.09(B) and 3.10(E)); proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) pass. The cover (PDF page 1), the table of contents (3 to 11), Appendix “A” (the Certification of Attorney Competency form, 67), the index (69 to 73) and four blank pages (2, 12, 66 and 68) belong to no card.
Division XI: information forms for data processing (Rule 11.2); required action - action taken on all calendared cases and a future date always set (Rule 11.19); and pro tem judges - an attorney named as a plaintiff in a civil or small claims case may not sit as a judge pro-tem during the case or within six months following its resolution, nor one named as a defendant in two or more such cases (Rule 11.22). Rules 11.1, 11.3 to 11.5, 11.7 to 11.18, 11.20 and 11.21 are repealed, and Rule 11.6 (voluntary arbitration; see Local Rule 10.2) was repealed and renumbered.
Duval County's indigent-defense and magistration rules under the Texas Fair Defense Act (S.B. 7): who may be booked into the county jail and on what paper; arrest-case numbering; presentment to a magistrate within 48 hours (art. 15.16); the magistrate's warnings, counsel inquiry, interpreter duty, indigence determination and appointment of counsel within 24 hours of a request; the alternative appointment plan under art. 26.04(g)-(h) with annual applications, seven attorney categories (capital, first and second degree, third degree/state jail/misdemeanor, competency, appeals, post-conviction, extradition), CLE and experience standards, random rotation within each category, written acceptance within 48 hours, first contact by the end of the next working day, replacement and suspension of counsel, fee applications within five days of completing services and the compensation attachment ($500 pleas; $175/$150 hourly; $1,400 per jury-trial day; appellate caps); bail schedules by offense class with a personal bond office (fee $20 or 3%), pre-trial supervision and revocation hearings within two working days; arraignment settings and notice; repeal of conflicting rules.