Loading…
Unlawful detainer cases are heard by qualified court commissioners; a party who chooses not to stipulate is referred to the Supervising Judge of the division in which the matter is pending (Richmond, Pittsburg, or the Supervising Civil Judge for Martinez); the court's authority under Code of Civil procedure section 259(b) is unaffected; Section 1 of Standing Order 5.17 of May 30, 2018 rescinded.
California > First Appellate District > Contra Costa County > Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 2021 JUDGE: REBECCA HARDIE DEPARTMENT 1 COURT CLERK: AIDA CHEONG UNREPORTED AMENDED STANDING ORDER 5.17* *Renumbered as 1.3 per 11-3-22 Order The following Amended Standing Order 5.17 is adopted, effective immediately. 1. The provisions of Section 1 of the Standing Order of the Civil Division concerning unlawful detainer cases, delineated Standing Order 5.17 and entered on May 30, 2018, are rescinded. 2. By order of the Presiding Judge, unlawful detainer cases in this Court are heard by qualified court commissioners. In the event a party chooses not to stipulate to the hearing of any unlawful detainer matter by a commissioner, the hearing shall be referred to the Supervising Judge of the division in which the matter is pending (either Richmond, Pittsburg, or, for Martinez, the Supervising Civil Judge) who may hear the matter or refer it to any other judge of this Court. This does not affect the Court’s authority, pursuant to Code of Civil procedure section 259(b), to direct a commissioner to “[t]ake proof and make and report findings thereon as to any matter of fact upon which information is required by the court,” where properly specified pursuant to that section. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 2, 2021 HON. REBECCA C. HARDIE Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Contra Costa County
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 2021 JUDGE: REBECCA HARDIE DEPARTMENT 1 COURT CLERK: AIDA CHEONG UNREPORTED AMENDED STANDING ORDER 5.17* *Renumbered as 1.3 per 11-3-22 Order The following Amended Standing Order 5.17 is adopted, effective immediately. 1. The provisions of Section 1 of the Standing Order of the Civil Division concern
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-08 (California T4 Contra Costa build 2026-10-08) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-contra-costa/docs/general/combined-standing-orders-8-11-2026.pdf (the court's “Appendix A: Standing Orders”, “Revised August 11, 2026”, as fetched 2026-10-08; 14177357 bytes, sha256 50e61603361f0c413700512b6bb1a4d78d849a061bcc1e6d3ec3dcb30fda7c49; 48 pages, scanned) - Standing Order 1.3, PDF page 6: read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi, each doubtful mark on a crop at 400 dpi; checked against three machine readings never published (RapidOCR on each whole page, the file's own text layer where a page has one, RapidOCR on each printed line): every 6-word window of the transcription looked up and each span no reading holds read again on the page image (vision/check-log.md). The compilation's label, the clerk's filed stamps, the signatures and the pleading paper's line numbers are not part of the text; the transcription's closing note, which describes them, is not published. Review note: The order was entered as Amended Standing Order 5.17 and renumbered 1.3 by the November 3, 2022 order re standing orders; "Code of Civil procedure" is so printed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.