Loading…
Written withdrawals or revocations of general time waivers in criminal cases may be filed only with the clerk of the court in the courtroom where the matter is scheduled to be heard or with the judicial assistant of the judge presiding in that department (if the judge or department is unknown or absent, with the clerk assigned as judicial assistant to the presiding judge), so that a time waiver is not withdrawn without actual notice to the judge responsible for scheduling trials (Arias v. Superior Court (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1, 4); defendants may still revoke time waivers orally in open court.
California > First Appellate District > Del Norte County > Superior Court of California, County of Del Norte
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF DEL NORTE Standing Order 13-002 Regarding Time Waiver Withdrawals Effective immediately, any written withdrawals or revocations of general time waivers in criminal cases may be filed only with the clerk of the court in the courtroom where the matter is scheduled to be heard or with the judicial assistant of the judge presiding in the department where the case is to be heard. If the judge or department is unknown or absent, the time waiver may be filed with the clerk assigned as judicial assistant to the presiding judge. This order is intended to prevent time waivers from being withdrawn without actual notice to the judge hearing the case who is responsible for scheduling trials within the time provided by law. Arias v. Superior Court (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1, 4 (Prichett, J. concurring). Nothing herein is intended to prevent defendants from orally revoking time waivers in open court. DATED: WILLIAM H. FOLLETT Presiding Judge of the Superior Court
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF DEL NORTE Standing Order 13-002 Regarding Time Waiver Withdrawals Effective immediately, any written withdrawals or revocations of general time waivers in criminal cases may be filed only with the clerk of the court in the courtroom where the matter is scheduled to be heard or with the judicial assistant of the judge presiding in the depa
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-10-10 (California T4 Del Norte build 2026-10-10) from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-del-norte/docs/so_13-002.pdf (7792 bytes, sha256 5f862731856a7e00d17d253f63655b406a6b8a582a7b1f61f616e5e20e09e2d5; 2 pages; 1 page with a printed text layer; 1 page with no text layer) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow): one page of text (the file's second page is blank - review/scan-sheets/check-log.txt); no chrome and no fixes; the date line (“DATED:” and a blank rule) and the printed name and title stand as printed - the posted copy, a Word file of August 20, 2014, carries no signature or date; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) pass. Review note: The posted copy is a Word file (created August 20, 2014) with no signature and its date line blank; the order's number places it in 2013 - a review task asks the court for the signed order's date.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.