Loading…
A purported "notice of unavailability" under Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. v. Sparks (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 299 is not a fileable document under the California Rules of Court and is an impermissible infringement of a trial court's inherent power to control its calendar (Carl v. Superior Court (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 73, 76-77); any such notice presented to the Clerk's Office for filing will be returned by the clerk to the presenting party.
California > First Appellate District > Del Norte County > Superior Court of California, County of Del Norte
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF DEL NORTE Standing Order 22-003 RE: Notice of Unavailability Pursuant to Tenderloin Housing Clinic A purported “notice of unavailability” pursuant to Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. v. Sparks (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 299, is not a fileable document under the California Rules of Court, and is an impermissible infringement of a trial court’s inherent power to control its calendar. (Carl v. Superior Court (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 73, 76-77.) Any such notice presented to the Clerk’s Office for filing will be returned by the clerk to the presenting party. DATED: MAR 21 2022 DARREN McELFRESH Presiding Judge
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF DEL NORTE Standing Order 22-003 RE: Notice of Unavailability Pursuant to Tenderloin Housing Clinic A purported “notice of unavailability” pursuant to Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. v. Sparks (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 299, is not a fileable document under the California Rules of Court, and is an impermissible infringement of a trial court’s in
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-10 (California T4 Del Norte build 2026-10-10) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-del-norte/docs/so-22-003.pdf (200400 bytes, sha256 f6a90ea4c7fcc47255d719c4b47ae4379730f8216914fa8e8cbd6052f5c6fad6; 1 page; a scan, page images, no text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi; checked against two machine readings never published (RapidOCR on each page and the file's own text layer, which this scan lacks): every 6-word window of the transcription looked up, and the 1 span the readings do not hold - a printed line the OCR skipped - read again on the page images (evidence/vision-check-2026-10-10-resolved.txt). The date stamps and handwritten dates are carried as printed; the signatures and the pleading paper's line numbers are not part of the text; the transcription's closing note, which describes the page, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.