An amended standing order of the Presiding Judge (Vicki Ashworth) dated January 8, 2024: civil assessments imposed at the reduced amount of $100.00 pursuant to Penal Code section 1214.1 and Assembly Bill 199 as of July 1, 2022; effective January 1, 2024, the court to discontinue imposing civil assessments in each eligible case in which a defendant has failed to appear or failed to pay, judicial discretion to impose a civil assessment on individual cases remaining, subject to ongoing statutory authority; effective on or before February 1, 2024, all outstanding debt from Civil Assessments imposed between July 1, 2022 and December 31, 2023 eliminated.
California > Third Appellate District > El Dorado County > Superior Court of California, County of El Dorado
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF EL DORADO 495 Main Street Placerville, CA 95667 DATE: January 08, 2024 JUDGE: Vicki Ashworth, Presiding Judge CLERK: Shawna Boley AMENDED STANDING ORDER RE: DISCONTINUANCE OF CIVIL ASSESSMENTS As of July 1, 2022, the Superior Court of California, County of El Dorado began imposing civil assessments at the reduced amount of $100.00 pursuant to Penal Code section 1214.1 and Assembly Bill 199. Effective January 1, 2024, the Superior Court of California, County of El Dorado shall discontinue imposing civil assessments in each eligible case in which a defendant has failed to appear or failed to pay. Subject to ongoing statutory authority, judicial discretion to impose a civil assessment on individual cases remains. Effective on or before February 1, 2024, all outstanding debt from Civil Assessments imposed between July 1, 2022 and December 31, 2023 is hereby eliminated. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: January 8, 2024 VICKI ASHWORTH Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of California
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF EL DORADO 495 Main Street Placerville, CA 95667 DATE: January 08, 2024 JUDGE: Vicki Ashworth, Presiding Judge CLERK: Shawna Boley AMENDED STANDING ORDER RE: DISCONTINUANCE OF CIVIL ASSESSMENTS As of July 1, 2022, the Superior Court of California, County of El Dorado began imposing civil assessments at the reduced amount of $100.00 pursuant to Penal Code secti
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-10 (California T4 El Dorado build 2026-10-10) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-el-dorado/docs/general/20240108-amended-standing-order-re-discontinuance-civil-assessments.pdf (348875 bytes, sha256 2691c9eab05a681260abb4f8c49853e3dea8bb17ba87b9a95a712f585f2cb546; 1 page; page images, no text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi (the file has no text layer); checked against machine readings never published (RapidOCR on each page): every 6-word window of the transcription looked up, and of the 3 spans the readings do not hold whole, 3 split into consecutive pieces each found in a reading (the caption, which the readings set in another order beside the seal and the filing stamp, and a line break) (vision/check-log.txt). What the pages print besides the text - seals, filing stamps, handwritten signatures, page numbers - is not part of the text; the transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published. Review note: Transcribed by eye (vision/check-log.txt).
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.