Loading…
A standing order of the Presiding Judge (Suzanne N. Kingsbury) dated May 22, 2013: a purported “notice of unavailability” pursuant to Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. v. Sparks (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 299 is not a fileable document under the California Rules of Court and is an impermissible infringement of a trial court’s inherent power to control its calendar (Carl v. Superior Court (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 73, 76–77); any such notice presented to the Clerk’s Office for filing returned by the clerk to the presenting party.
California > Third Appellate District > El Dorado County > Superior Court of California, County of El Dorado
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF EL DORADO 1354 Johnson Boulevard South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 DATE: May 22, 2013 JUDGE: Suzanne N. Kingsbury, Presiding Judge CLERK: Derinda Lambie STANDING ORDER RE: NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY PURSUANT TO TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC A purported “notice of unavailability” pursuant to Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. v. Sparks (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 299, is not a fileable document under the California Rules of Court, and is an impermissible infringement of a trial court’s inherent power to control its calendar. (Carl v. Superior Court (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 73, 76–77.) Any such notice presented to the Clerk’s Office for filing will be returned by the clerk to the presenting party. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 23, 2013 SUZANNE N. KINGSBURY Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of California cc: Bench Officers cc: Court Administration
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF EL DORADO 1354 Johnson Boulevard South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 DATE: May 22, 2013 JUDGE: Suzanne N. Kingsbury, Presiding Judge CLERK: Derinda Lambie STANDING ORDER RE: NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY PURSUANT TO TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC A purported “notice of unavailability” pursuant to Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. v. Sparks (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 299, is not a filea
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-10 (California T4 El Dorado build 2026-10-10) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-el-dorado/docs/pdf/standing_orders/Notice of Unavailablity Pursuant Tenderloin Housing Clinic 05-22-13.pdf (216759 bytes, sha256 0fe2f7339a91c0b0d4a24c17358ab59f904d032eb6b35f03fc5b4723a824b2f0; 1 page; page images, no text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi (the file has no text layer); checked against machine readings never published (RapidOCR on each page): every 6-word window of the transcription looked up, and of the 2 spans the readings do not hold whole, 2 split into consecutive pieces each found in a reading (the caption, which the readings set in another order beside the seal and the filing stamp, and the signature block with its copy line) (vision/check-log.txt). What the pages print besides the text - seals, filing stamps, handwritten signatures, page numbers - is not part of the text; the transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published. Review note: Transcribed by eye (vision/check-log.txt); the caption dates the order May 22, 2013 and its date line May 23, 2013.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.