Loading…
Article VII (Family Law Rules; Rules 7.1 to 7.12): an Income and Expense Declaration and a Property Declaration before every default and contested hearing on a financial issue, with schedules, and the exchange at least five (5) days before the hearing of wage stubs for the preceding three (3) months and the latest federal income tax return (Rule 7.1); the State of California's Guideline Calculator in Title IV-D cases and certified programs for temporary spousal support (Rule 7.2); child custody (Rule 7.3); Court Mediation of unresolved custody and visitation issues, after the Pre-Mediation Orientation Program and domestic violence assessment scheduled through the Family Law Facilitator, with the domestic violence protocol, confidential and non-confidential mediation under Family Code § 3183(a), interpreters and parties who live outside the county (Rule 7.4); child custody investigators and evaluators - no peremptory challenge, change requests by written motion and the complaint procedure (Rule 7.5); subject children in the courtroom only with the Court's prior knowledge and consent (Rule 7.6); minor's counsel under Family Code §§ 3150 et seq., their rights and the complaint procedure (Rule 7.7); the duties of the Family Law Facilitator on child support (Rule 7.8); arbitration of community estates up to $50,000 (Rule 7.9); the family centered case resolution process - a status conference noticed on filing, a mandatory settlement conference and a Statement of Issues, Contentions, and Proposed Disposition of the Case at least five (5) days before it (Rule 7.10); default or uncontested proceedings (Rule 7.11); and stipulations for a Special Master under Code of Civil Procedure § 638 (Rule 7.12).
California > Fourth Appellate District > Inyo County > Superior Court of California, County of Inyo
ARTICLE VII FAMILY LAW RULES RULE 7.1 FINANCIAL ISSUES The following rules apply to all Family Law, Domestic Violence, Paternity, and Department of Child Support Services proceedings where any financial matter is at issue, including, but not necessarily limited to, any request for child support, spousal support, family support, or attorneys fees and/or costs. The Court strongly encourages the parties to completely and timely disclose all relevant financial information to each other and the Court whenever a financial matter is at issue. (a) REQUIREMENT OF COMPLETED INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION. In all such proceedings, prior to every default hearing and every contested hearing, there shall be served and filed by each party an Income and Expense Declaration and a Property Declaration, on the forms prescribed respectively by the California Rules of Court, unless the matter to be considered at the hearing does not involve the consideration of any financial issue. Such statements shall show conditions as they existed no earlier than 60 days prior to the hearing, shall be executed by the declarant on a date not earlier than 60 days prior to the hearing, shall be completely filled out so that every blank calling for information available to the declarant is filled out (with the word "none," if that be an appropriate response), and shall be filed no later than two court days prior to the hearing, unless an earlier filing is required by rule of statute. Parties are encouraged to serve and file such declarations at least five (5) days prior to any such hearing. An Income and Expense Declaration is not fully complete unless it contains the following: (1) Schedules wherever required (including all business income, commission income, rental income, interest income, etc.) These schedules shall completely set forth the source of income, total gross income, an itemization of all deductions, and the net income after deductions. Business expense schedules shall identify depreciation and any other non-cash expenses. (2) A fully completed section on attorney's fees, including the hourly rate, if any, even if attorney's fees have not been requested. (3) A schedule of bonuses, if any, setting forth the amount and date of the most recent bonus, the date on which the next bonus is expected to be received, and the amount of the next bonus (if known) (4) A statement of overtime and a description of the frequency of receipt. (5) An estimate of the other party's income. (6) Proof of self-employment income. If a party is self-employed, the income and expense declaration shall contain a full description of current year's claimed income and expenses and depreciation if the party is self-employed. In the event the other party requires additional time for hearing on the examination of these expenses, the court may consider a motion to set the matter over for hearing to a date certain. (b) REQUIREMENT OF EXCHANGE OF FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS; PENALTY FOR LACK OF COMPLIANCE. In addition to timely service and filing of any and all moving papers, opposition, or reply documents, as required by law and these Rules, each party shall exchange, at least five (5) days prior to any hearing involving financial matters (unless an earlier time is required by rule or statute), wage stubs or other documents evidencing income for the preceding three (3) months. Additionally, each party shall provide to the other a copy of the party's most recent federal income tax return. If the hearing is scheduled between February 1 and the date the parties' tax return is filed, copies of all W-2 forms, 1099 forms, and other forms reflecting receipt of income during the previous year shall be exchanged. Where available, a self-employed party shall provide his/her most recent business profit and loss or financial statement. A failure to comply with this rule may result in an adverse ruling or either monetary, issue, or terminating sanctions. (Adopted, effective January 1, 2002) RULE 7.2 DETERMINATION OF CHILD AND SPOUSAL SUPPORT (a) For the purpose of determining guideline child support, in Title IV-D cases, the Court will only accept and use the State of California’s Guideline Calculator. (b) If the non-custodial parent is exercising visitation with the minor child or children, the court will use the actual time share in the guideline calculation. (c) An award of temporary spousal support, may in the Court's discretion, be calculated using, the state’s Guideline Calculator, Dissomaster computer software program, or any other support program, provided the same is certified pursuant to the provisions of Family Code § 3830, and California Rules of Court, Rule 5.275. The provisions of this Rule are not intended to limit the Court's discretion except as otherwise provided by applicable law. (Adopted, effective January 1, 2002; Amended, effective July 1, 2024) RULE 7.3 CHILD CUSTODY The Court is committed to the principle that parents should retain responsibility for child rearing and should not abdicate that authority to the Court. Consequently, extraordinary efforts are expended to assist parents in resolving differences and formulating a parenting plan that is in the best interest of the children. Mediation provides a framework within which parents can make their own decisions regarding the lives of their children. The Court believes that agreements made by the parties which are mutually viewed as being in the best interest of the children, have a substantially greater likelihood of successful implementation. Parties who are able to reach mediated agreements, especially during the early stages of separation and/or dissolution, significantly reduces the likelihood of costly and emotionally damaging litigation at every milestone in the child's life. Parties are encouraged to resolve disputes by using all available resources, including mediation in the private sector. If any parenting (custody/visitation) issues remain unresolved, "Court Mediation" is required prior to hearing. (Adopted, effective January 1, 2002) RULE 7.4 COURT MEDIATION AND PARENT EDUCATION (a) If any issue pertaining to child custody and/or child visitation remains unresolved, even following private mediation, the Parties are required and ordered, prior to hearing or trial, to participate in good faith in "Court Mediation," which is paid for by the Court. "Court Mediation" is mediation with the Mediator approved by the Superior Court of California, County of Inyo (also referred to herein as the "Court Mediator.") The Office of the Clerk and Office of the Court's Administrator maintains a current list of Court approved Mediators. Parties may of course initially utilize the services of a court approved mediator, without having first attempted mediation in the private sector. (b) Prior to attending Court Mediation, all parties are required to participate in the Court's Pre-Mediation Orientation Program and domestic violence assessment. All parties are required to contact the Family Law Facilitator at 301 W. Line Street, Bishop, CA 93514; Tel: (760) 872-6240 to schedule their intake, pre-mediation orientation, and domestic violence assessment. To assist parties, the Court through its Family Court Services Program, provides Extended Family Law Facilitator Services and assistance from a Family Court Services Coordinator. Information and details about the Pre-Mediation Orientation program, and availability of assistance from the Family Law Facilitator and/or Family Court Services Coordinator is available at the Office of the Court Clerk. (c) The Court’s protocol for mediation services in cases involving a history of domestic violence between the parties, or where a protective order as defined in Family Code § 6218 is in effect, includes the following: (1) The Court’s Family Law Mediation Instructions & Requirements packet shall contain a statement of each party’s right to request separate mediation as provided by Family Code § 3181; (2) As required by Rule 7.4(b) above, both parties are required to participate in a pre-mediation intake and orientation through the offices of this Court’s Family Law Facilitator. Intake forms shall include a statement that if a party alleging domestic violence in a written declaration under penalty of perjury or a party protected by a protective order so requests, the mediator will meet with the parties separately and at separate times. (3) As required by Rule 7.4(b) above, both parties are required to complete a domestic violence assessment administered through this Court’s Office of the Family Law Facilitator, which assessment shall include both parties completing a written domestic violence screening form. (4) Upon request of the Family Law Facilitator, the Clerk’s Office will promptly conduct a search of this Court’s case management system to ascertain if either or both of the parties are subject to a protective order as defined in Family Code § 6218. (5) The Family Law Facilitator shall notify the Mediator of any known history of domestic violence or applicable protective order. (6) The Family Law Facilitator and/or Mediator may contact the Court’s Executive Officer or his/her designee, to address special security needs, including, but not limited to, utilization of court facilities for conducting the mediation, and/or making special arrangements for the bailiff or other security staff to be available during mediation. (d) Attorneys should prepare clients to participate in mediation in an open, responsive, and receptive manner. Clients should be advised that the focus of mediation is on the present and future, and should come to mediation with proposals regarding residence, timesharing, education, child care, transportation, holidays, vacation, special needs of the children, and decision making responsibilities. (e) Initial Child Custody/Visitation mediation shall be “confidential mediation.” Notwithstanding this rule, the Court Mediator may under certain circumstances be required by law to report to Child Protective Services, and/or disclose the existence of threats of death or bodily harm in accordance with applicable law, including the Supreme Court's ruling in Tarasoff v. Board of Regents, 17 Cal.3d 425. Further, the Mediator may report to the Court the Mediator’s opinion that a child custody evaluation is indicated, appointment of minor’s counsel is indicated, and/or recommendation that to protect the well-being of the child involved in the controversy that restraining orders be issued. (f) If “confidential mediation” is not successful, in whole or in part, the Court may order the parties to participate in “non-confidential mediation” pursuant to Family Code § 3183(a), wherein the Mediator shall submit a recommendation to the Court as to the custody of and/or visitation with the child or children. The Court may, without foundation, consider the report and recommendation of the Mediator. Non-confidential mediation shall be conducted by a Mediator named in the court’s separate list of “Court Approved Non-Confidential or Recommending Mediators.” Unless both parties stipulate otherwise, the Non-Confidential or Recommending Mediator shall not be the same Mediator who conducted “confidential mediation” with the parties. If an agreement is reached during “non-confidential” mediation, which the mediator does not believe is in the child or children’s best interest, the mediator’s report shall so inform the court with a statement of reasons. (g) When an agreement is reached in confidential or non-confidential mediation that resolves all issues pending in any OSC or motion, the attorneys or parties shall prepare a written stipulation in proper form for filing as a stipulated order or judgment. (h) If paternity is disputed, the issue need not be resolved by the Court prior to mediation. Mediation shall not be denied to the parties on the basis that paternity is an issue in the proceeding before the court. (Family Code § 3172) The Court may make a pendente lite order granting visitation to a non-custodial parent absent the tests authorized by Evidence Code § 621, upon a finding that the granting of such visitation rights would be in the best interests of the child. (i) A non-English-speaking parent must be accompanied by a neutral individual who is fluent in both English and the party's native language in order for mediation to proceed. (j) In the event one of the parties to the mediation is not a resident of Inyo County, application can be made to the Court to waive participation in the pre-mediation orientation program and/or to participate in mediation telephonically. (k) If the Court orders any party or child of a party, to participate in counseling as provided by Family Code § 3190, or any other provision of law, said party and their Counsel shall cooperate with the Family Court Services Coordinator in effectuating said counseling services. (Adopted, Effective 01-01-02; Amended July 1, 2010) RULE 7.5 CHILD CUSTODY INVESTIGATIONS (a) No peremptory challenge is permitted of any child custody investigator or evaluator appointed by the Court pursuant to the provisions of Family Code §§ 3110 et seq. (b) A request by a party for a change of a court appointed child custody investigator or evaluator must be made by written motion, with service on counsel or the other party in propria persona. Such application may be made on an ex parte basis with notice by 10:00 a.m. the court day before the hearing per California Rules of Court, Rule 5.151. Such requests will only be granted upon a strong showing of good cause. (c) The grievance procedure outlined herein is not for the use of expressing dissatisfaction regarding recommendations made by any court appointed child custody investigator or evaluator. (d) Any person with complaints about their experience with any court appointed child custody investigator or evaluator are encouraged to first raise their concerns with the individual involved and seek to resolve the concern. (e) The court appointed child custody investigator or evaluator is not an employee of the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Inyo, but rather an independent contractor. (f) Should a party wish to file a formal complaint, the same must be in writing, and served on the Presiding Judge of the Court. The Presiding Judge or his or her designee will review the complaint, investigate, and determine whether the complaint is meritorious. In the event the complaint is found to be meritorious, the Presiding Judge may in his or her discretion take such lawful action as the Presiding Judge deems appropriate, just, and proper. Such action may include removal of the court appointed child custody investigator or evaluator from the case involving the complaining party, and appointing another investigator or evaluator. (Adopted, Effective January 1, 2002; Amended July 1, 2024) RULE 7.6 CHILDREN IN COURTROOM While children who are the subject of litigation may appear at the courthouse, it is the policy of the Court not to have any subject child in the courtroom without the Court's prior knowledge and consent. Children shall remain the hallway, child's waiting room, or other appropriate and convenient location in the care of a responsible adult who is not a party to the action. (Adopted, Effective January 1, 2002) RULE 7.7 APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL TO REPRESENT CHILD AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE (a) Governed by the provisions of Family Code §§ 3150 et seq., and California Rules of Court, Appendix Div. 1, Section 20.5, the Court in its discretion may appoint counsel to represent the minor children in family law cases (minor’s counsel). (b) Counsel so appointed to represent the minor children shall have the following rights, unless otherwise limited by the Court's Order: (1) Reasonable access to the child with adequate notice; (2) Notice of any and all proceedings, including any request for examinations affecting the child; (3) Full access to all court pleadings and records; any and all medical, psychological, psychiatric, educational, and school testing and records; as well as all records maintained by Inyo County Child Protective Services (CPS), except that the identity of the reporting party on any CPS referral or report shall remain confidential, unless the reporting party is one of the parents; (4) The right to veto any physical or psychological examination or evaluation, for purposes of hearing or trial, which has not been ordered by the Court; (5) The right to assert on behalf of the child any privilege for discovery purposes; and, (6) The right to seek independent psychological, educational, and/or physical examination or evaluation of the child upon application to the Court. (c) A request by a party for a change of court appointed counsel for a minor child or children must be made by written motion, with service on all counsel, including minor’s counsel, and the other party if in propria persona. The notice of motion shall indicate the nature of the motion without setting forth specific or factual grounds in support of the motion. The motion itself, supporting declarations, memorandums of points and authorities, and any other pleadings or documents filed with the court setting forth the grounds or basis seeking such removal or change in court appointed minor’s counsel, shall be filed under seal. Such motions will only be granted upon a strong showing of good cause. The motion shall initially be heard by a judge other than the judge assigned to hear the custody/visitation matter. The judge initially hearing the motion may, in his or her discretion, refer the matter for further hearing and determination by the judge assigned to hear the custody/visitation matter. (1) The grievance procedure outlined herein is not for the use of expressing dissatisfaction regarding recommendations made by any court appointed minor’s counsel. (2) Any person with complaints about their experience with any court appointed minor’s counsel are encouraged to first raise their concerns with the individual attorney and seek to resolve the concern. (3) The court appointed minor’s counsel is not an employee of the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Inyo, but rather an independent contractor.Any counsel appointed must meet the requirements set forth in Rule 5.242, California Rules of Court, and shall file in each case Form FL-322 (Declaration of Counsel for a Child Regarding Qualifications. (4) In lieu of moving to remove and/or substitute court appointed minor’s counsel, should a party wish to file a formal complaint, the same must be in writing, and served on the Presiding Judge of the Court. The Presiding Judge or his or her designee will review the complaint, investigate, and determine whether the complaint is meritorious. In the event the complaint is found to be meritorious, the Presiding Judge may in his or her discretion take such lawful action as the Presiding Judge deems appropriate, just, and proper. (Adopted, effective January 1, 2002; Amended, effective July 1, 2010) RULE 7.8 FAMILY LAW FACILITATOR SERVICES As authorized by Family Code Section 10005, and provided funding is available for the same, the Inyo County Family Law Facilitator shall have the following additional duties; (a) With regard to the issues of child support and issues relating directly to the resolution of child support issues; (1) Meeting with litigants to mediate such issues; (2) Drafting stipulations to include all such issues agreed to by the parties; (3) If the parties are unable to resolve such issues with the assistance of the facilitator, prior to or at the hearing, and at the request of the court, reviewing the paperwork, examining documents, preparing support schedules, and advising the Judge whether or not the matter is ready to proceed with regard to such issues; (4) Preparing formal orders on such issues, consistent with the court's announced order in cases where both parties are unrepresented, as directed by the court; (5) Assisting the court with research and other responsibilities with regard to such issues, which will enable the court to be responsive to the litigants needs; (6) Serving as special master in proceedings with regard to such issues and making findings with regard to such issues to the court, except where the facilitator has served as a mediator in the case; and, (7) Developing programs for the Bar and community outreach through day and evening programs, video tapes, and other innovative means that will assist unrepresented and financially disadvantaged litigants to gain meaningful access to the Family Court regarding such issues. (b) Work to enhance and improve services available in Inyo County to children and parents, relating to issues of child support and issues directly related to the resolution of child support issues by working with the local Bar, Department of Child Support Services, Inyo County Child Protective Services, Inyo County Victim-Witness Assistance Program, Inyo County Health and Human Services Department (including Welfare, Behavioral Health Services, Substance (Abuse programs), Inyo County Probation Department, Wild Iris Women's Services, and other community groups and legal service organizations or private practitioners which provide mediation or settlement services, domestic violence treatment services, visitation supervision services, counseling, or other services to children and/or parents related to child support. (c) Maintain records and statistical data and information pertaining to the services provided under this Rule and as may be required by Federal or State Law, California Rules of Court, or as may be required by the Administrative Office of the Courts, or by the Inyo County Superior Court. (Effective December 1, 1997) RULE 7.9 ARBITRATION Pursuant to the provisions of Family Code § 2554, the Court may in its discretion order arbitration of the character, value and division of the community estate, if in the Court's opinion, the total value of the community and quasi-community property in controversy does not exceed $50,000. (Adopted, effective January 1, 2002) RULE 7.10 FAMILY CENTERED CASE RESOLUTION PROCESS (a) Upon the filing of a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage, Legal Separation, Petition for Dissolution of Domestic Partnership, Petition for Legal Separation of Domestic Partnership, or Petition to Determine Parental Relationship, the Clerk shall issue a notice of setting of a Status Conference. The Petitioner shall serve a copy of the Notice of Status Conference along with the Petition and Summons, and file a proof of service of the same. (b) Both parties are required to appear at the Status Conference; however, such appearance may be by CourtCall. No pleading need be filed for the Status Conference. (c) Absent express leave of Court, a mandatory settlement conference shall be held before any Dissolution of Marriage, Legal Separation, Petition for Dissolution of Domestic Partnership, Petition for Legal Separation of Domestic Partnership, or Petition to Determine Parental Relationship action is set for trial. (e) At least five (5) days prior to the date set for mandatory settlement conference, the parties shall serve and file a "Statement of Issues, Contentions, and Proposed Disposition of the Case." Said Statement shall include a full and complete statement of property, income, and expenses. Information contained in a Final Disclosure Statement may be incorporated by reference, with a copy attached. The Settlement Conference Statement must contain detailed statements of the party’s position on each issue to be decided at the long cause hearing or trial. If some issues were previously resolved, the Settlement Conference Statement must describe that resolution and refer to any filed supporting documents. (e) If the matter is not completely settled and set for trial, the Court may require the parties to serve and file another or amended Statement Of Issues, Contentions, And Proposed Disposition Of The Case prior to trial. (Adopted, effective January 1, 2002; Amended, effective July 1, 2024) RULE 7.11 DEFAULT OR UNCONTESTED PROCEEDINGS In default and uncontested proceedings, the Court will review marital settlement agreements and proposed judgments, particularly with respect to child and spousal support. The Court will particularly scrutinize proposed judgments where one or both parties are in Pro Per, and the marriage was of long duration. The Court may in its discretion direct the filing of Income and Expense Declarations or other documentation, and set the matter for further hearing regarding the entry of the judgment. (Adopted, effective January 1, 2002) RULE 7.12 STIPULATIONS FOR USE OF SPECIAL MASTER IN CHILD CUSTODY CASES (a) “Special Master” designates the person appointed pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 638 in family law custody cases to make decisions about custody-related issues other than decisions involving the substantial modification of legal or physical custody. Use of a Special Master is intended as an alternative to frequent, continuing custody litigation. The Special Master may be a mental health professional or attorney who possesses the minimum qualifications deemed appropriate by the court to serve as a Special Master. (b) Parties may use a Special Master by agreement and written stipulation and order only. The court will not order parties to use a Special Master. Upon execution of a stipulation appointing a Special Master which stipulation includes a specific time period during which the parties agree to participate with the Special Master, the court will enforce such a stipulation for the time period designated by the parties. (c) Upon appointment of a Special Master by stipulation of the parties, the Special Master may make decisions which, in the absence of an objection raised by a party by timely filing a motion with the court as more specifically set forth in the stipulation appointing the Special Master, will have the effect of a court order. (d) Any stipulation appointing a Special Master must include the following specific provisions: (1) A grievance procedure; (2) A term of appointment; (3) A definition of the scope of authority of the Special Master; (4) A statement of quasi-judicial immunity; (5) A hearing process; (6) A decision process; and, (7) An agreement for payment of fees charged by the Special Master. (Adopted, effective July 1, 2010)
ARTICLE VII FAMILY LAW RULES RULE 7.1 FINANCIAL ISSUES The following rules apply to all Family Law, Domestic Violence, Paternity, and Department of Child Support Services proceedings where any financial matter is at issue, including, but not necessarily limited to, any request for child support, spousal support, family support, or attorneys fees and/or costs. The Court strongly encourages the part
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-10-07 (California T4 Inyo build 2026-10-07) from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-inyo/docs/local-rules/inyo-local-rules-court-7-1-2025-final.pdf (2192390 bytes, sha256 a6aa75be2cec1e4f127ddf327214b9c900e83376971d9542c1aaafb652cc7684; 68 pages) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow). The rules (pages 6 to 56) were composed once and cut at each article heading (the book's two title lines and the twelve articles rejoin to the whole): the running header (Local Rules of Court - Inyo County Superior Court (Rev. 7-1-2025)-) and the page numbers removed as chrome; one word struck through in two places (Rule 9.4) taken out as deleted text (the composer's strike_out; custody review/strike-report-2026-10-07.txt); the cover, the table of contents and list of currently effective rules, and Appendix I (the alternative dispute resolution forms) belong to no article card; lines reflowed into the court's paragraphs, each rule heading on its own line; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) pass. Documented layout fixes (whitespace only, read on the page; the proofs hold): the Family Law Facilitator's address in Rule 7.4 (b) (“Bishop, CA” / “93514; Tel:”, one sentence) joined. Review note: Published as printed (each read on the page): Rule 7.6 “Children shall remain the hallway”; Rule 7.7 (c)(3) “an independent contractor.Any counsel” and “Form FL-322 (Declaration of Counsel for a Child Regarding Qualifications.” without a closing parenthesis; Rule 7.10 letters its subdivisions (a), (b), (c), (e), (e).
Division XI: information forms for data processing (Rule 11.2); required action - action taken on all calendared cases and a future date always set (Rule 11.19); and pro tem judges - an attorney named as a plaintiff in a civil or small claims case may not sit as a judge pro-tem during the case or within six months following its resolution, nor one named as a defendant in two or more such cases (Rule 11.22). Rules 11.1, 11.3 to 11.5, 11.7 to 11.18, 11.20 and 11.21 are repealed, and Rule 11.6 (voluntary arbitration; see Local Rule 10.2) was repealed and renumbered.
Duval County's indigent-defense and magistration rules under the Texas Fair Defense Act (S.B. 7): who may be booked into the county jail and on what paper; arrest-case numbering; presentment to a magistrate within 48 hours (art. 15.16); the magistrate's warnings, counsel inquiry, interpreter duty, indigence determination and appointment of counsel within 24 hours of a request; the alternative appointment plan under art. 26.04(g)-(h) with annual applications, seven attorney categories (capital, first and second degree, third degree/state jail/misdemeanor, competency, appeals, post-conviction, extradition), CLE and experience standards, random rotation within each category, written acceptance within 48 hours, first contact by the end of the next working day, replacement and suspension of counsel, fee applications within five days of completing services and the compensation attachment ($500 pleas; $175/$150 hourly; $1,400 per jury-trial day; appellate caps); bail schedules by offense class with a personal bond office (fee $20 or 3%), pre-trial supervision and revocation hearings within two working days; arraignment settings and notice; repeal of conflicting rules.