Loading…
Standing Order 2003-01: when the court receives notification from the Sheriff’s Department that a defendant reporting to jail to serve time was turned away because the jail did not receive commitment papers, the clerk may issue and submit a commitment form for the defendant, giving the defendant credit for the one day that would have been served.
California > Third Appellate District > Lassen County > Superior Court of California, County of Lassen
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LASSEN STANDING ORDER 03-01 RE: Granting One Day Credit for Jail Time *************** WHEN the court receives notification from the Sheriff’s Department that a defendant reporting to jail to serve time was turned away because the jail did not receive commitment papers; THE CLERK may issue and submit a commitment form for the defendant, giving the defendant credit for the one day that would have been served if the paper work had been received. Date: JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LASSEN STANDING ORDER 03-01 RE: Granting One Day Credit for Jail Time *************** WHEN the court receives notification from the Sheriff’s Department that a defendant reporting to jail to serve time was turned away because the jail did not receive commitment papers; THE CLERK may issue and submit a commitment form for the
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Lassen build 2026-10-12) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-lassen/docs/general-orders/standing-order-03-01.pdf (31375 bytes, sha256 e324fbca42ed1e299aea40581c92298c14de0cbf9310064135a9729d8315fb33; 1 page; page images, no text layer): read on the page image rendered at 200 dpi; checked against RapidOCR on the page (the scan carries no text layer of its own), never published: every 6-word window looked up, and of the 1 span no reading holds, 1 split into pieces a reading holds (the handwritten date and the signature that crosses the printed signature line) (vision/check-log.txt). Not part of the text: the clerk's filing stamp (“JAN 16 2003”, signed by a deputy); the date written by hand on the date line and the judge's handwritten signature. The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published. Review note: The order names no judge: its signature line prints JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT under a handwritten signature; its handwritten date and the clerk’s filing stamp both read January 16, 2003.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.