Loading…
Probate Division and Probate Investigations Office clerical staff may affix the signature stamp of the Supervising Judge of the Probate and Mental Health Division, or designee, to nine listed orders (among them orders for appearance and examination, final discharge, appointment of counsel and probate referees, case reassignment, access to medical records, orders prescribing notice, and the first continuance of a probate petition hearing). The General Orders page links this file as “Standing Order Re Granting Permission to Affix Court's Facsimile Signature of a Supervising Judge, Site Judge or Designee of the Central Probate Division on Specific Documents (October 1, 2018)”.
California > Second Appellate District > Los Angeles County > Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles > Probate
2022-GEN-013-00 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN THE MATTER OF THE COURT’S PERMISSION TO AFFIX ITS SIGNATURE STAMP TO SPECIFIC DOCUMENTS GENERAL ORDER GRANTING PERMISSION TO AFFIX SIGNATURE STAMP OF THE SUPERVISING JUDGE, OR DESIGNEE, OF THE PROBATE DIVISION ON SPECIFIC DOCUMENTS The Probate Division clerical personnel and the Probate Investigations Office clerical personnel are hereby authorized to affix the signature stamp of the Supervising Judge of the Probate and Mental Health Division, or Designee to the following documents filed in the Probate Division: 1. Order for Appearance and Examination – Form AT-138/EJ-125; 2. Ex-Parte Order for Final Discharge – Form DE-295/GC; 3. Order Appointing Court Appointed Counsel – Form LASC PRO 086; 4. Order for Appointment of Probate Referee – Form LASC PRO 001; 5. Order for Appointment of Probate Referee – Form LASC XLIT 008; 6. Order of Case Reassignment – Form PRO063; 7. Order Authorizing Access to Medical Records – Form LASC PRO 082; 8. Order Prescribing Notice (Probate) – Form DE-200/GC-200; 9. Order to Continue Probate Petition Hearing – Form PRO080. The clerk is authorized to continue a probate petition hearing, only when it is the first request to continue. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 24, 2022 ERIC C. TAYLOR Presiding Judge GENERAL ORDER – DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
2022-GEN-013-00 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN THE MATTER OF THE COURT’S PERMISSION TO AFFIX ITS SIGNATURE STAMP TO SPECIFIC DOCUMENTS GENERAL ORDER GRANTING PERMISSION TO AFFIX SIGNATURE STAMP OF THE SUPERVISING JUDGE, OR DESIGNEE, OF THE PROBATE DIVISION ON SPECIFIC DOCUMENTS The Probate Division clerical personnel and the Probate Investigations Office
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Los Angeles build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-los-angeles/general-orders/LIBOPSProbate-34-StandingOrderGrantingPermissionToAffixCourtsFacsimileSignatureOfAJudgeOnDocuments.pdf (224438 bytes, sha256 34c818fbf2359aaae288c27ed006418a158fefed5a310bd69b611546801dbfb5; 1 page) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow), reading the glyphs drawn on the page: page numbers, pleading line numbers, the order number and running footer titles removed as chrome; the two-column pleading caption set left cell, then right cell (the “)” column and the box's rule left out); lines reflowed into the order's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only), proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) and proof 3 (same characters as the glyphs drawn on the page) all pass.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.