Rescinds the General Order for Mandatory Electronic Filing for Adoption, Abandonment, and Emancipation (2022-GEN-015-00, issued August 11, 2022); the requirements for electronic filing are in Local Rule 6.1.
California > Second Appellate District > Los Angeles County > Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles > Juvenile
2026-GEN-001-00 FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles MARCH 20, 2026 David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court By: R. Mina, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT - MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR ADOPTIONS, ABANDONMENT, AND EMANCIPATION ORDER RESCINDING GENERAL ORDER IN RE MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR ADOPTIONS, ABANDONMENT, AND EMANCIPATION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the General Order for Mandatory Electronic Filing for Adoption, Abandonment, and Emancipation, 2022-GEN-015-00, previously issued on August 11, 2022, is hereby rescinded. Requirements concerning electronic filing are contained in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Local Rules, rule 6.1. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: March 20, 2026 __________________________________ SERGIO C. TAPIA II Presiding Judge ORDER RESCINDING GENERAL ORDER IN RE MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR ADOPTION, ABANDONMENT, AND EMANCIPATION
2026-GEN-001-00 FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles MARCH 20, 2026 David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court By: R. Mina, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT - MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR ADOPTIONS, ABANDONMENT, AND EMANCIPATION ORDER RESCINDING GENERAL ORDER IN RE MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FIL
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Los Angeles build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-los-angeles/general-orders/LIBOPSJuvenile-78-2026-GEN-001-00_GeneralOrderReRecissionofAdoptionMandatoryEfilingOrder032026.pdf (234057 bytes, sha256 0b8b1158be965013bbd076292fa321e97c66a282608e79713e9ee9162305c2e0; 1 page) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow), reading the glyphs drawn on the page: page numbers, pleading line numbers, the order number and running footer titles removed as chrome; the two-column pleading caption set left cell, then right cell (the “)” column and the box's rule left out); lines reflowed into the order's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only), proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) and proof 3 (same characters as the glyphs drawn on the page) all pass.
A 2013 standing order requiring attorneys to e-file family-law and civil documents (no paper filings accepted) as the court began compliance with the Supreme Court's e-filing mandate; criminal filing unchanged.
A 2013 standing order requiring attorneys to e-file family-law and civil documents (no paper filings accepted) as the court began compliance with the Supreme Court's e-filing mandate; criminal filing unchanged.