Rescinds the General Order for Mandatory Electronic Filing for Appellate Division (2024-GEN-014-00, issued November 13, 2024); the requirements for electronic filing are in Local Rule 9.2.
California > Second Appellate District > Los Angeles County > Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles > Appellate
2026-GEN-002-00 FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles MARCH 20, 2026 David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court By: R. Mina, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT - MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR APPELLATE DIVISION ORDER RESCINDING GENERAL ORDER IN RE MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR APPELLATE DIVISION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the General Order for Mandatory Electronic Filing for Appellate Division, 2024-GEN-014-00, previously issued on November 13, 2024, is hereby rescinded. Requirements concerning electronic filing are contained in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Local Rules, rule 9.2. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: March 20, 2026 __________________________________ SERGIO C. TAPIA II Presiding Judge ORDER RESCINDING GENERAL ORDER IN RE MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR APPELLATE DIVISION
2026-GEN-002-00 FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles MARCH 20, 2026 David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court By: R. Mina, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT - MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR APPELLATE DIVISION ORDER RESCINDING GENERAL ORDER IN RE MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR APPELLATE DIVI
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Los Angeles build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-los-angeles/general-orders/LIBOPSAppellate-10-2026-GEN-002-00_GeneralOrderReRecissionofAppellateDivisionMandatoryEfilingOrder032026.pdf (265025 bytes, sha256 36c6e93fb39bf92e708e58691fb4d836dbb2f7e21f8eaa951a21997e44ae46be; 1 page) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow), reading the glyphs drawn on the page: page numbers, pleading line numbers, the order number and running footer titles removed as chrome; the two-column pleading caption set left cell, then right cell (the “)” column and the box's rule left out); lines reflowed into the order's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only), proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) and proof 3 (same characters as the glyphs drawn on the page) all pass.
A 2013 standing order requiring attorneys to e-file family-law and civil documents (no paper filings accepted) as the court began compliance with the Supreme Court's e-filing mandate; criminal filing unchanged.
A 2013 standing order requiring attorneys to e-file family-law and civil documents (no paper filings accepted) as the court began compliance with the Supreme Court's e-filing mandate; criminal filing unchanged.