Loading…
Rescinds the General Order Mandatory Electronic Filing for Probate Records (2017-GEN-014, issued March 27, 2017); the requirements for electronic filing are in Local Rules 3.4 and 4.7.
California > Second Appellate District > Los Angeles County > Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles > Probate
2026-GEN-006-00 FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles MARCH 20, 2026 David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court By: R. Mina, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT - MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR PROBATE RECORDS ORDER RESCINDING GENERAL ORDER IN RE MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR PROBATE RECORDS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the General Order Mandatory Electronic Filing for Probate Records, 2017-GEN-014, previously issued on March 27, 2017, is hereby rescinded. Requirements concerning electronic filing are contained in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Local Rules, rules 3.4 and 4.7. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: March 20, 2026 __________________________________ SERGIO C. TAPIA II Presiding Judge ORDER RESCINDING GENERAL ORDER IN RE MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR PROBATE RECORDS
2026-GEN-006-00 FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles MARCH 20, 2026 David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court By: R. Mina, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT - MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR PROBATE RECORDS ORDER RESCINDING GENERAL ORDER IN RE MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING FOR PROBATE RECORDS P
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Los Angeles build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-los-angeles/general-orders/LIBOPSProbate-38-2026-GEN-006-00_GeneralOrderReRecissionofProbateEfilingOrder032026.pdf (190071 bytes, sha256 76194239c5dcc65a02be4ae60f30f1ba865a6d2332a4c3e19038d32b387c923e; 1 page) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow), reading the glyphs drawn on the page: page numbers, pleading line numbers, the order number and running footer titles removed as chrome; the two-column pleading caption set left cell, then right cell (the “)” column and the box's rule left out); lines reflowed into the order's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only), proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) and proof 3 (same characters as the glyphs drawn on the page) all pass.
A 2013 standing order requiring attorneys to e-file family-law and civil documents (no paper filings accepted) as the court began compliance with the Supreme Court's e-filing mandate; criminal filing unchanged.
A 2013 standing order requiring attorneys to e-file family-law and civil documents (no paper filings accepted) as the court began compliance with the Supreme Court's e-filing mandate; criminal filing unchanged.