Loading…
Rescinds the Standing Order Re Online Dispute Resolution (LASC-ODR for unlawful detainers, 2021-SJ-010-00, August 17, 2021): the court no longer requires or encourages LASC-ODR in unlawful detainer cases, access to the platform for those matters is suspended, and mediation through the ODR process is no longer available.
California > Second Appellate District > Los Angeles County > Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles > Civil / Eviction - Unlawful Detainer (UD); Civil / Small Claims
2025-SJ-010-00 [File stamp: FILED, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, DEC 22 2025, David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, By: P. Flores, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE UNLAWFUL DETAINER (EVICTION) CASES ORDER RESCINDING STANDING ORDER RE ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Standing Order Re Online Dispute Resolution (LASC-ODR For Unlawful Detainers), 2021-SJ-010-00, previously issued on August 17, 2021, is hereby rescinded. Effective immediately, the Court will no longer require or encourage registration or participation in LASC-ODR in unlawful detainer cases. Access to the LASC Online Dispute Resolution platform for unlawful detainer matters is suspended, and mediation assistance through the ODR process will no longer be available. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 22, 2025 Judge Lawrence P. Riff Supervising Judge, Civil Division ORDER RESCINDING STANDING ORDER RE ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION [The day of the month is handwritten.]
2025-SJ-010-00 [File stamp: FILED, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, DEC 22 2025, David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, By: P. Flores, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE UNLAWFUL DETAINER (EVICTION) CASES ORDER RESCINDING STANDING ORDER RE ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Standing Order Re Onli
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Los Angeles build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-los-angeles/general-orders/LIBWEBRESOURCE-591-2025-SJ-010-00-OrderRescindingStandingOrderReOnlineDisputeResolution-122225.pdf (30880 bytes, sha256 5793149f8e5c0da7210960768d19d4c1c69440cfeab33f40107d354b697f1af0; 1 page) - the court's own posted PDF, a page scan: transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against the image; a local machine reading (RapidOCR) served only as a second reader, every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten or stamped fills in place with a bracketed note, a running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.