Effective April 20, 2026, a pilot at the Compton Courthouse in limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer cases, with free mediation by the County's Department of Consumer and Business Affairs for qualified parties: plaintiffs must serve the Notice: Unlawful Detainer Diversion Pilot at Compton Courthouse (SCLAC CIV 317) on all defendants with the complaint and summons. The General Orders page lists the order as of April 16, 2026; the order is dated and filed April 14, 2026.
California > Second Appellate District > Los Angeles County > Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles > Civil / Eviction - Unlawful Detainer (UD)
2026-SJ-005-00 FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles APR 14 2026 David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court By: C. Guerrero, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE NOTICE REGARDING MEDIATION SERVICES: UNLAWFUL DETAINER DIVERSION PILOT AT COMPTON COURTHOUSE STANDING ORDER PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that effective April 20, 2026, the Superior Court of Los Angeles County will implement a pilot program at Compton Courthouse in limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer (eviction) cases. The Department of Consumer and Business Affairs of Los Angeles County will provide free mediation services to qualified parties in limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer (eviction) cases. Pursuant to this Order, plaintiffs in these cases must serve the Notice: Unlawful Detainer Diversion Pilot at Compton Courthouse, SCLAC CIV 317, on all defendants when serving the complaint, summons, and any other required documents/forms. Form SCLAC CIV 317 can be found on the Court’s website by clicking the following link, Court Forms. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 14, 2026 ____________________________________ Judge Lawrence P. Riff Supervising Judge, Civil Division STANDING ORDER - IN RE NOTICE REGARDING MEDIATION SERVICES: UNLAWFUL DETAINER DIVERSION PILOT AT COMPTON COURTHOUSE
2026-SJ-005-00 FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles APR 14 2026 David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court By: C. Guerrero, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE NOTICE REGARDING MEDIATION SERVICES: UNLAWFUL DETAINER DIVERSION PILOT AT COMPTON COURTHOUSE STANDING ORDER PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that effective April 20, 2026, the S
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Los Angeles build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-los-angeles/general-orders/LIBOPSCivil-404-StandingOrderReNoticeofUnlawfulDetainerDiversionPilot.pdf (133529 bytes, sha256 26161bd5f9758ed6df24268e9666987016ab99e3cf22f4972a16199101ec417b; 1 page) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow), reading the glyphs drawn on the page: page numbers, pleading line numbers, the order number and running footer titles removed as chrome; the two-column pleading caption set left cell, then right cell (the “)” column and the box's rule left out); lines reflowed into the order's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only), proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) and proof 3 (same characters as the glyphs drawn on the page) all pass.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.