Loading…
Effective March 16, 2026, a pilot at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse in limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer cases, with free services from the We are Los Angeles Program (sponsored by the Mayor's Fund for LA): plaintiffs must serve the Notice: Unlawful Detainer Settlement Services at Stanley Mosk Courthouse (SCLAC CIV 313) on all defendants with the complaint and summons.
California > Second Appellate District > Los Angeles County > Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles > Civil / Eviction - Unlawful Detainer (UD)
2026-SJ-004-00 [File stamp: FILED, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, MAR 17 2026, David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, By: C. Guerrero, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE NOTICE REGARDING SERVICES: UNLAWFUL DETAINER SETTLEMENT PILOT AT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE STANDING ORDER PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that effective March 16, 2026, the Superior Court of Los Angeles County will implement a pilot program at Stanley Mosk Courthouse in limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer (eviction) cases. The We are Los Angeles Program, sponsored by the Mayor’s Fund for LA, will provide free services for qualified parties in limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer (eviction) cases. Pursuant to this Order, plaintiffs in these cases must serve the Notice: Unlawful Detainer Settlement Services at Stanley Mosk Courthouse, SCLAC CIV 313, on all defendants when serving the complaint, summons and any other required documents/forms. Form SCLAC CIV 313 can be found on the Court’s website, https://s.lacourt.org/9HKDP11. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 17, 2026 Judge Lawrence P. Riff Supervising Judge, Civil Division STANDING ORDER – NOTICE REGARDING SERVICES: UNLAWFUL DETAINER SETTLEMENT PILOT AT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE
2026-SJ-004-00 [File stamp: FILED, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, MAR 17 2026, David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, By: C. Guerrero, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE NOTICE REGARDING SERVICES: UNLAWFUL DETAINER SETTLEMENT PILOT AT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE STANDING ORDER PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that effective March
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Los Angeles build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-los-angeles/general-orders/LIBOPSCivil-401-StandingOrderinreNoticeRegardingServicesUnlawfulDetainerSettlementPilotatStanleyMoskCourthouse.pdf (151743 bytes, sha256 c8e68e3c0400a0f9f920684843c57dba77b900c5578251138ed5659992ab67b5; 1 page) - the court's own posted PDF, a page scan: transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against the image; a local machine reading (RapidOCR) served only as a second reader, every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten or stamped fills in place with a bracketed note, a running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.