Loading…
Under the court's inherent discretionary authority as recognized in Robert S. v. Superior Court (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 1417, and as otherwise authorized by law, all parties in juvenile delinquency cases pending before the Juvenile Court shall comply with the reciprocal discovery provisions of Penal Code section 1054 et seq.
California > Third Appellate District > Placer County > Superior Court of California, County of Placer
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PLACER SITTING AS THE JUVENILE COURT STANDING ORDER OF THE JUVENILE COURT No. 14-003 RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS Pursuant to the court’s inherent discretionary authority as recognized in Robert S. v. Superior Court (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 1417, and as otherwise authorized by law, all parties in juvenile delinquency cases pending before the Juvenile Court shall comply with the reciprocal discovery provisions pursuant to Penal Code section 1054 et seq. DATE: 2-5-14 PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE JUVENILE COURT COLLEEN M. NICHOLS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PLACER SITTING AS THE JUVENILE COURT STANDING ORDER OF THE JUVENILE COURT No. 14-003 RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS Pursuant to the court’s inherent discretionary authority as recognized in Robert S. v. Superior Court (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 1417, and as otherwise authorized by law, all parties in juvenile delinquency cas
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-10 (California T4 Placer build 2026-10-10) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-placer/docs/Local Rules of Court_Effective January 1 2026_FINAL_0.pdf (the court's rule book: 1566260 bytes, sha256 17cd12d45c63fb379e965d7c730b6e1f4d6629be9cb3cf233a810f15f977f9ac; 105 pages; this order PDF page 101, scanned page images under the book's running header): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi; checked against two machine readings never published (RapidOCR on each page and the book's own text layer, which carries only the running header and the page number over each scan): every 6-word window of the transcription looked up, and the 3 spans the readings do not hold - the caption's two boxes read row by row, the handwritten date and the stamped name - read again on the page images (vision/check-log.txt). The handwritten numbers and dates and the date stamps are carried as printed; the signatures, the clerk's FILED stamps and the pleading paper's line numbers are not part of the text; the transcription's closing note, which describes the page, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.