Loading…
Rule 9 (Rules 9.1 to 9.4): the criminal, family and juvenile law departments to communicate and exchange information with each other prior to issuing protective orders and child custody and visitation orders (9.1); the family court or the juvenile court shall not issue a protective order or custody order in conflict with the order of the criminal court, the orders of the criminal law proceeding to control (9.2); a court issuing a criminal court protective order may, after consultation with the family or juvenile court, modify it to allow or restrict contact between the restrained person and his or her children (9.3); multiple restraining orders protecting the protected person enforced in priority under Code of Civil Procedure 527.12(d)(2), Penal Code Section 136.2 and Family Code Section 6383(h)(2) and 6405(b) (9.4); the provisions of an Emergency Protective Order (EPO) more restrictive than the other orders enforced, and the provisions of another order that do not conflict with the EPO enforced (9.4(a)); a no-contact order enforced (9.4(b)); if none of the orders are an EPO or a no-contact order, the most recent Criminal Protective Order (CPO), a CPO issued in a criminal case involving domestic violence or charges requiring sex offender registry enforced over any civil court order (9.4(c)); and among civil restraining orders the order issued last (9.4(d)).
California > Third Appellate District > Plumas County > Superior Court of California, County of Plumas
RULE 9. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COORDINATION RULES 9.1 COURT COMMUNICATION Until the court has an operational case management system capable of automatically coordinating domestic violence orders, whenever possible the Court’s criminal, family and juvenile law departments shall communicate and exchange information with each other prior to issuing protective orders and child custody and visitation orders to determine if any such orders have already been issued as to the same parties or children in any other department. (Effective 1/1/07, Amended 7/1/08) 9.2 AVOIDING CONFLICTING ORDERS The family court or the juvenile court shall not issue a protective order or custody order in conflict with the order of the criminal court. In the event such an order issues inadvertently, the orders of the criminal law proceeding shall control. (Effective 7/01/08) 9.3 MODIFICATION OF CRIMINAL ORDERS A court issuing a criminal court protective order may, after consultation with the family or juvenile court, modify the criminal court protective order to allow or restrict contact between the restrained person and his or her children. (Effective 7/01/08) 9.4 COEXISTING CRIMINAL AND FAMILY OR JUVENILE ORDERS If multiple restraining orders have been issued protecting the protected person from the restrained person, the orders must be enforced in the following priority pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 527.12(d)(2), Penal Code Section 136.2, Family Code Section 6383(h)(2) and 6405(b). (a) Emergency Protective Order (EPO). Provisions that are more restrictive than in the other restraining/protective orders must also be enforced. Provisions of another order that do not conflict with the EPO must be enforced. (b) No-Contact Order. If a restraining/protective order includes a no-contact order, the no-contact order must also be enforced. (c) Criminal Protective Order (CPO). If none of the orders are an EPO or a no-contact order, the most recent CPO must be enforced. A CPO issued in a criminal case involving domestic violence or charges requiring sex offender registry must be enforced over any civil court order. All other provisions in the civil order that do not conflict with the CPO must be enforced. (d) Civil Restraining Orders. If there is more than one civil restraining order (domestic violence, juvenile, elder abuse, civil harassment), then the order that was issued last must be enforced. Provisions that do not conflict with the most recent civil restraining order must be enforced. (Effective 7/01/08, Amended 7/1/26)
RULE 9. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COORDINATION RULES 9.1 COURT COMMUNICATION Until the court has an operational case management system capable of automatically coordinating domestic violence orders, whenever possible the Court’s criminal, family and juvenile law departments shall communicate and exchange information with each other prior to issuing protective orders and child custody and visitation orders
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Plumas build 2026-10-12) from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-plumas/docs/local-rules/local-rules-2026.pdf (the court's rule book, its cover “SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF PLUMAS LOCAL RULES OF COURT Effective July 1, 2026”, as fetched 2026-10-12; 1224627 bytes, sha256 3c2cc28bf533a918211db4c6240c158fce01c5569c8c175b91dbd61eb2fa07f2; 100 pages; this rule PDF pages 72 to 73, printed pages 63 to 64) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow): the rules (PDF pages 10 to 88, printed 1 to 79) composed as one text and cut at the twelve rule headings - “RULE OF COURT NO. 1 GENERAL RULES”, “RULE OF COURT NO. 2 CIVIL LAW AND MOTION MATTERS”, “RULE 3. CASE MANAGEMENT” to “RULE 12. MISCELLANEOUS” (“Rule 11. Unlawful Detainers” as printed), each matched once as a whole line, each rule beginning a page - and Appendix “B”, the Appellate Division Local Rules (PDF pages 96 to 100), composed apart; the running header of every page (“Superior Court of California, County of Plumas”) and its page number (“1”; “Appendix “B” - 1”), each named and a whole line in its band, removed as chrome - 158 and 10 chrome lines; lines reflowed into the rules' paragraphs, each rule's heading, each numbered sub-rule (“1.4 TIMELY APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND REQUIRED NOTIFICATION:”), each lettered or numbered subdivision starting a line, a line in capitals ending its paragraph, and each history line (“(Effective ...)”, “(Amended ...)”) on a line of its own; the strike report (review/strike-report-2026-10-12.txt) finds no struck run on the book's 100 pages; 20 whitespace-only fixes (build/book-fixes.json: five lines rejoined - the two-line headings of Rule 3.7 and Rule 8, Rule 3.7(f)'s line wrapped inside its paragraph, and Rule 4.3(1)'s run-in list and Rule 10.6(6)'s reference wrapped at “(3)” and “(e)”, which the reflow took for labels; fifteen lines set apart - a row of Rule 4.3(2)'s trial binder table, three of Rule 6.17(b)(4)'s bulleted issues, Rule 10.2's excepted case categories one a line, row by row, left to right, and a Rule 12.3 addressee's heading from the next address); the vertical-gap, short-line, page-break, bold, false-break, fragment and row audits (custody file book_extra_audits.py; review/book-extra-audits-2026-10-12.txt and review/book-audits-after-fixes-2026-10-12.txt) list candidates read one by one (build/book_fixes.py) - the rest kept as printed (the lines ending at the court's web address, the run-in bold headings of Rules 5.3(c)(4) and 6.15(a), Rule 12.3's “To:” labels, the binder rows' stray words, the inner labels of Rules 1.9(g) and 6.15(c), Rule 12.3's two “(a)”); proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) pass. The cover (PDF page 1), the table of contents (2 to 9, printed i to viii), the index (89 to 94, printed A to F) and Appendix “A” (the Certification of Attorney Competency form, 95) belong to no card.
Division XI: information forms for data processing (Rule 11.2); required action - action taken on all calendared cases and a future date always set (Rule 11.19); and pro tem judges - an attorney named as a plaintiff in a civil or small claims case may not sit as a judge pro-tem during the case or within six months following its resolution, nor one named as a defendant in two or more such cases (Rule 11.22). Rules 11.1, 11.3 to 11.5, 11.7 to 11.18, 11.20 and 11.21 are repealed, and Rule 11.6 (voluntary arbitration; see Local Rule 10.2) was repealed and renumbered.
Duval County's indigent-defense and magistration rules under the Texas Fair Defense Act (S.B. 7): who may be booked into the county jail and on what paper; arrest-case numbering; presentment to a magistrate within 48 hours (art. 15.16); the magistrate's warnings, counsel inquiry, interpreter duty, indigence determination and appointment of counsel within 24 hours of a request; the alternative appointment plan under art. 26.04(g)-(h) with annual applications, seven attorney categories (capital, first and second degree, third degree/state jail/misdemeanor, competency, appeals, post-conviction, extradition), CLE and experience standards, random rotation within each category, written acceptance within 48 hours, first contact by the end of the next working day, replacement and suspension of counsel, fee applications within five days of completing services and the compensation attachment ($500 pleas; $175/$150 hourly; $1,400 per jury-trial day; appellate caps); bail schedules by offense class with a personal bond office (fee $20 or 3%), pre-trial supervision and revocation hearings within two working days; arraignment settings and notice; repeal of conflicting rules.