Loading…
Standing order, signed by the Presiding Judge: for the orderly administration of justice, public safety and courthouse security and the media’s fair and orderly access to information, no television or still cameras permitted to operate in any public area of the courthouse regarding any court case; no press conferences or interviews in connection with a court case in any public area of the courthouse, any area outside the courthouse where no entrance or exit is obstructed available for them; media personnel and other members of the public not to photograph, film or interview any jurors or prospective jurors serving in the courthouse, nor discuss any court case within earshot of jurors or prospective jurors; all cellular phones, pagers or other electronic devices turned off while in a courtroom; no photographing or filming through the courtroom doors when open, nor of a defendant entering or leaving the courthouse or courtroom, nor of any vehicle or persons accompanying a defendant; all conditions for media coverage subject to modification by the Court at any time, members of the media requesting a modification with sufficient time in advance of a hearing; the rights of photographers, recorders and broadcasters governed by California Rule of Court 1.150.
California > Third Appellate District > Plumas County > Superior Court of California, County of Plumas
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF PLUMAS STANDING ORDER REGULATING MEDIA ACTIVITY IN THE QUINCY COURTHOUSE In order to allow for the orderly administration of justice, to provide for public safety and courthouse security and to allow the media fair and orderly access to information they need in the public interest, the Court has elected to exercise the following controls in the Quincy courthouse: 1. No television or still cameras will be permitted to operate in any public area of the courthouse regarding any court case. 2. No press conferences or interviews in connection with a court case may be conducted in any public area of the courthouse. Any area outside the courthouse where no entrance or exit is obstructed may be used to conduct press conferences and interviews. 3. Media personnel and other members of the public shall not photograph, film or interview any jurors or prospective jurors serving in the courthouse. Media personnel and other members of the public shall not discuss any court case within earshot of jurors or prospective jurors. 4. Media personnel and other members of the public shall turn off all cellular phones, pagers or other electronic devices while in a courtroom. 5. Media personnel and other members of the public shall not photograph or film through the courtroom doors when open. 6. Media personnel and other members of the public shall not photograph or film a defendant entering or leaving the courthouse or courtroom. No photographs or video recordings are to be made of any vehicle or persons accompanying a defendant either to or from the courthouse. 7. All conditions for media coverage are subject to modification by the Court at any time. Members of the media may request a modification of this order, provided there is sufficient time in advance of a hearing to allow the Court to modify any part of its security and/or media plan. 8. The rights of photographers, recorders and broadcasters are governed by the provisions of California Rule of Court 1.150. Dated: Presiding Judge Plumas Superior Court
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF PLUMAS STANDING ORDER REGULATING MEDIA ACTIVITY IN THE QUINCY COURTHOUSE In order to allow for the orderly administration of justice, to provide for public safety and courthouse security and to allow the media fair and orderly access to information they need in the public interest, the Court has elected to exercise the following controls in the Quincy courtho
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Plumas build 2026-10-12) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-plumas/docs/local-rules/standing-order-regulating-media-activity-quincy-courthouse.pdf (372066 bytes, sha256 26f1105ed8f40717fc6801ec8492cf466e3ddc3ea4c2186aaead727b5c266434; 2 pages; page images, no text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi; checked against RapidOCR on the pages (the scan carries no text layer of its own), never published: every 6-word window looked up, and of the 4 spans the reading does not hold, 3 split into pieces the reading holds (the filing stamp at the height of the court's name and the title, the page break between items 6 and 7 (page 2's running head read by the machine), and the date line and the signature block read apart) and 1 read again on the page image (the item number “5.” at the left margin, which the machine reading leaves out) (vision/check-log.txt). Not part of the text: page 2's running head (the order's title repeated) and the page numbers; the clerk's filing stamp (“MAY -2 2017”, signed by a deputy clerk); the date written by hand on the date line and the Presiding Judge's handwritten signature, which crosses the printed words “Presiding Judge”. The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.