Blanket Order No. 15, signed by Mark E. Petersen as Presiding Judge of the Juvenile Court: juvenile court records may be inspected only by following the procedures of Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 827-828 and Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.552; the order supersedes the juvenile court's earlier “T.N.G” orders and memorandums, the latest signed on May 21, 2015.
California > Fourth Appellate District > Riverside County > Superior Court of California, County of Riverside
[File stamp: FILED, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AUG - 9 2023, with a deputy clerk's handwritten signature] SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Blanket Order No. 15 CONFIDENTIALITY OF JUVENILE RECORDS Juvenile court records may only be inspected by following the procedures contained within Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 827-828, Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.552. This Order supersedes any previous Juvenile Court “T.N.G” Orders and memorandums, including those with dates as signed on August 15, 1978; January 7, 1981; April 23, 1985; January 30, 1987; March 31, 1988; December 16, 1988; December 20, 1993; October 8, 1996; November 20, 2002; April 21, 2005; February 18, 2009; and May 21, 2015. Dated: 8/9/23 Mark E. Petersen Presiding Judge of the Juvenile Court Riverside County Superior Court 8/9/23 [The caption's left cell is blank, closed by a column of parentheses; the order number and title stand to its right. The date "8/9/23" after "Dated:" is handwritten; the order is signed above the printed name. The typed "8/9/23" at the foot of the page is transcribed as printed. "T.N.G" is transcribed as printed. Line numbers are omitted.]
[File stamp: FILED, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AUG - 9 2023, with a deputy clerk's handwritten signature] SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Blanket Order No. 15 CONFIDENTIALITY OF JUVENILE RECORDS Juvenile court records may only be inspected by following the procedures contained within Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 827-828, Cal. Rules of Court,
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Riverside build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-riverside/docs/juvenile-blanket/juvorder_15.pdf (410589 bytes, sha256 816a5b499d84ed27a9181bbd975e33f14f6e70c4e6c0bf89fc69bbda737954c0; 1 page) - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; RapidOCR's reading of each page, and the file's own text layer where it has one, served only as second readers - every six-word window of the transcription was looked up in them and every miss checked on the page image (custody vision/check-log.md); the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, running footers transcribed once, pleading line numbers omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.