Loading…
Blanket Order No. 25, signed by Hon. Jacqueline Jackson as Juvenile Presiding Judge: under WIC section 827, the subject of a juvenile case file and the subject's criminal defense counsel or counsel's agents may inspect and copy the file without a court hearing or order; on an informal written request by assigned counsel accompanied by a release signed by the client, the custodian of records of the Probation Department, the Department of Child Protective Services and other county agencies shall make the file available and provide copies, except as specified in section 827, subdivision (a)(3); fifteen categories of confidential or privileged matter are redacted unless they are the subject's own information; and the records are subject to a protective order limiting their use to criminal and habeas corpus proceedings, including all appeals.
California > Fourth Appellate District > Riverside County > Superior Court of California, County of Riverside
[File stamp: FILED, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, JUN 22 2017, with a deputy clerk's handwritten signature] IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JUVENILE DIVISION BLANKET ORDER NO. 25 SECTION 827 HEARING AND ORDER NOT REQUIRED FOR SPECIFIED INDIVIDUALS TO INSPECT AND RECEIVE COPY OF JUVENILE CASE FILE Under WIC section 827(a)(l)(C) & (E), the subject of a juvenile case file, his/her criminal defense counsel, and/or defense counsel’s authorized agent(s), may access and obtain copies of the subject’s juvenile case file, defined in WIC section 827(e) and Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 5.552. The right of such parties to inspect and receive copies of juvenile records pertaining to a Section 300 petition is limited by subdivision (a)(3) of section 827, which prohibits release of privileged or confidential portions of the juvenile case file to anyone other than one who is entitled to assert or waive the privilege or confidentiality provision at issue. Inspection and copying of the records does not require a court hearing or order under section 827. This Order seeks to streamline the process in which the subject or his attorney may access those documents required to be reviewed and, possibly, disseminated to other 827(a)(A) through (O) parties, in criminal and habeas corpus proceedings, particularly those in which defense counsel is obligated to present evidence regarding the circumstances of his/her client’s childhood, in accordance with Miller v. Alabama (2012) 567 U.S. ___ [132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed. 2d 407], People v. Caballero (2012) 55 Ca1.4th 262, People v. Gutierrez (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1354; People v. Franklin (2016) 63 Ca1.4th 261, and People v. Perez (2016) 3 Cal.App.5th 612 and Penal Code sections 1170, subdivision (d)(2), 3051, and 4801, subdivision (c). Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ordered that, upon receipt of an informal written request by assigned counsel for the person who is the subject of the juvenile case file and who is also the subject of a dependency, delinquency, criminal, habeas, or other post-conviction release proceeding, accompanied by a release of confidential or privileged information signed by the client, the custodian of records for the Probation Department, the Department of Child Protective Services, and any other County agency tasked with maintaining documents included in the “juvenile case file,” shall make all information contained in the juvenile case file, except as specified in section 827, subdivision (a)(3) or other governing provisions of state and federal law, available to the requestor and/or his/her agent for inspection, and upon request, shall provide him/her with a digital or actual copy of any item contained in the juvenile case file. This order is subject to the confidential/privileged matters that must be redacted from the case file before it is inspected or copied; including: 1. Sexual Assault Victim-Counselor Privileged Records (Evidence Code §§ 1035-1036) 2. Drug/Alcohol Abuse Patient Records (42 Code of Federal Regulations, Ch. 1. Sub ch. A, Part 2), 3. Mental Health Records (Welfare & Institutions Code § 5328, California Civil Code §§ 56 et seq., Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 160, 162, and 164), 4. Psychotherapist-Patient Records (Evidence Code §§ 1010-1015), 5. Physician-Patient Information/Medical Records (Evidence Code §§ 992-994 and Civil Code §56), 6. Identity of Reporting Party of Child Abuse (Penal Code § 11167(d)), 7. Suspected Child Abuse Report (Penal Code § 11167.5), 8. AIDS/HIV Results (Health & Safety Code §§ 120980, 121010), 9. CLETS Records (Penal Code § 11105 and welfare & Institutions Code § 16504.5), 10. Public Social Services Records (Welfare & Institutions Code § 10850), 11. School Pupil Records (Education Code §§ 49076, 49602), 12. Unrelated Children’s names and information (Welfare & Institutions Code § 827(a)(2); and Rules of Court, Rule 5.552), 13. Attorney/Client work product. (Code of Civil Procedure § 2018.010 et seq; Evidence Code § 950-962). 14. Social Security Numbers of any individuals (California Constitution Article I, § 1). 15. Names and Information of Care Providers, including financial information (Health & Safety Code § 1536; Welfare & Institutions Code §§ 308, 10850 However, the information in numbers 1 – 15 above shall not be redacted if it is the subject’s information. The records are subject to a protective order. The records may only be utilized in criminal and habeas corpus proceedings, up to and including all appeals. Dated: June 20, 2017 HON. JACQUELINE JACKSON Juvenile Presiding Judge Riverside Superior Court [The file stamp overprints the end of the first caption line. The caption's left cell is blank, closed by a column of parentheses; the order number and its bold title stand to its right. Case names are italic in the print except "Perez" in "People v. Perez". The date "June 20, 2017" is handwritten; the order is signed over the printed name. The print's "827(a)(l)(C)" (a letter l), "Ca1.4th" (a digit 1, twice), "Ch. 1. Sub ch. A", "welfare & Institutions Code" (item 9) and item 15's unclosed parenthesis are transcribed as printed. Line and page numbers are omitted.]
[File stamp: FILED, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, JUN 22 2017, with a deputy clerk's handwritten signature] IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JUVENILE DIVISION BLANKET ORDER NO. 25 SECTION 827 HEARING AND ORDER NOT REQUIRED FOR SPECIFIED INDIVIDUALS TO INSPECT AND RECEIVE COPY OF JUVENILE CASE FILE Under WIC section 827(a)(l)(C) & (E), the s
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Riverside build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-riverside/docs/juvenile-blanket/juvorder_25.pdf (339992 bytes, sha256 98306a53ee2da2afa23dcc081b2b66167742393c0afb22d7fa97c5f493b8af13; 3 pages) - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; RapidOCR's reading of each page, and the file's own text layer where it has one, served only as second readers - every six-word window of the transcription was looked up in them and every miss checked on the page image (custody vision/check-log.md); the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, running footers transcribed once, pleading line numbers omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.