Loading…
The standing order of March 1, 2007 appointing Conflict Criminal Defenders to represent former CCD clients whose cases involve issues raised by Cunningham v. California, where the former client asked for a consultation on review of the sentence, is not represented by other counsel on any challenge to the underlying case, and received an upper term sentence.
California > Third Appellate District > Sacramento County > Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, MAR 1 2007, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-07-3 ORDER: CONFLICT CRIMINAL DEFENDERS (CCD)APPOINTMENT IN CASES WITH CUNNINGHAM ISSUES IT IS HEREBY THE ORDER OF THIS COURT: Conflict Criminal Defenders (CCD) is appointed to provide necessary and appropriate representation to former CCD clients whose cases involve issues raised by the ruling in Cunningham v. California (2007) __U.S.__; 127 S.Ct. 856; 166 L.Ed.2d 856 in all cases where: (1) the former client has generated the request for consultation over review of their sentence, (2) the former client is not currently represented by any other attorney in regard to any legal challenge to the underlying case, and (3) the former client was sentenced in the underlying case to an upper term sentence. This order shall remain in full force and effect until further notice (or until rescinded, revoked or superseded.) DATED: March 1, 2007 ROLAND L. CANDEE Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Standing Order of the Superior Court Number: SSC-07-3 Order: Conflict Criminal Defenders (CCD) Appointment in Cases with Cunningham Issues [The order bears the seal of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.]
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, MAR 1 2007, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-07-3 ORDER: CONFLICT CRIMINAL DEFENDERS (CCD)APPOINTMENT IN CASES WITH CUNNINGHAM ISSUES IT IS HEREBY THE ORDER OF THIS COURT: Conflict Criminal Defenders (CCD) is appointed to provide necessary and appropriate represent
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Sacramento build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-sacramento/standing-orders/SSC-7-3.pdf (164764 bytes, sha256 c19b111a28d7a14c9a5756162355d1a306ccf3f05b4775edf183c911d1c0e71e; 1 page), a page scan whose only text is an invisible OCR layer - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; the file's OCR text layer served only as a second reader - every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, the running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.