Loading…
The standing order of May 6, 2011 authorizing the Department of Revenue Recovery to serve notice, by mail to the probationer's last known address, of hearings on the court's FTPF calendar, which monitors payment of fines and fees imposed as conditions of probation; a probationer who fails to appear may face a bench warrant under Penal Code sections 978.5 and 1203.2(a).
California > Third Appellate District > Sacramento County > Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, MAY 6 2011, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-11-4 ORDER AUTHORIZING DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RECOVERY TO SERVE NOTICE OF HEARINGS This Court has initiated a calendar (FTPF calendar) to monitor payments of court ordered fines and fees that are imposed as conditions of probation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Department of Revenue Recovery (DRR) is authorized to serve notices on the Court’s behalf to probationers who shall be required to appear at hearings on the FTPF calendars. Notice of the court hearing shall be mailed to the probationer’s last known address, which all probationers are required to provide to the court as a condition of probation. Failure of a probationer to appear in response to the notice from DRR may result in the issuance of a bench warrant for the probationer’s arrest pursuant to the Court’s authority under Penal Code sections 978.5 and/or 1203.2(a). DATED: May 6, 2011 THE HONORABLE STEVE WHITE Presiding Judge Standing Order of the Superior Court Number SSC-11-4 Order Authorizing Department of Revenue Recovery to Serve Notice of Hearings [The day of the date, "6", is handwritten. The order bears the seal of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.]
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, MAY 6 2011, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-11-4 ORDER AUTHORIZING DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RECOVERY TO SERVE NOTICE OF HEARINGS This Court has initiated a calendar (FTPF calendar) to monitor payments of court ordered fines and fees that are imposed as conditions of
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Sacramento build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-sacramento/standing-orders/SSC-11-4.pdf (159895 bytes, sha256 a306a2f4966fafed1aff6e001d7197e74f62305c33372b758baa2e01c8289cef; 1 page), a page scan whose only text is an invisible OCR layer - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; the file's OCR text layer served only as a second reader - every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, the running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.