Loading…
The first amended standing order (dated June 18, 2012; effective July 1, 2012) requiring civil litigants filing a complaint, cross-complaint, petition or application to provide one additional complete paper copy, which the court places in the Public Access Bin for public inspection; pleadings may not be removed from the courthouse and may be copied there at the person's own expense.
California > Third Appellate District > Sacramento County > Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, JUN 18 2012, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-11-9 FIRST AMENDED ORDER: REQUIRING CIVIL LITIGANTS TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COPY OF ALL CASE INITIATING PLEADINGS AT TIME OF FILING (Effective July 1, 2012) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Effective July 1, 2012, all civil litigants filing case initiating pleadings, including complaints, cross-complaints, petitions and applications, shall provide one additional complete paper copy of the pleading at the time of filing. The additional copy of the pleading shall be placed by the Court in a receptacle labeled Public Access Bin on the day the filing is processed and made available for public inspection subject to the restriction of California Rules of Court, Title 2, Division 4. No person shall remove any pleading in the Public Access Bin from the court building. Any person inspecting a pleading from the Public Access Bin may copy it inside the courthouse at that person’s own expense. The person shall promptly return the pleading to the Public Access Bin after inspection/copying. DATED: June 18, 2012 THE HONORABLE LAURIE M. EARL Presiding Judge Standing Order of the Superior Court Number SSC-11-9 First Amended Order: Requiring Civil Litigants to Provide Additional Copy of All Case Initiating Pleadings at Time of Filing [The day of the date, "18", is handwritten. The order bears the seal of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.]
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, JUN 18 2012, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-11-9 FIRST AMENDED ORDER: REQUIRING CIVIL LITIGANTS TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COPY OF ALL CASE INITIATING PLEADINGS AT TIME OF FILING (Effective July 1, 2012) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Effective July 1, 2012, all civil lit
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Sacramento build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-sacramento/standing-orders/SSC-11-9.pdf (742508 bytes, sha256 c86233c8cf4803a8c0167708fcdebd436119d6ef7892710b035e603c81c2a974; 1 page), a page scan whose only text is an invisible OCR layer - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; the file's OCR text layer served only as a second reader - every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, the running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.