Loading…
The standing order of June 10, 2013 providing that, when the Public Defender declines appointment for overload under Penal Code section 987.2, the court appoints an attorney from the Indigent Defense Panel, paid on the IDP fee schedule, and appointing the Conflict Criminal Defenders' office to select the panel attorney and administer the appointments.
California > Third Appellate District > Sacramento County > Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, JUN 10 2013, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-13-8 ORDER: CONFLICT CRIMINAL DEFENDERS’ (CCD) APPOINTMENT IN CASES WHERE THE PUBLIC DEFENDER DECLARES AN OVERLOAD Effective immediately, in any case in which the Public Defender declines to accept appointment due to overload, pursuant to its authority under Penal Code section 987.2, the Court shall appoint an attorney from the Indigent Defense Panel (IDP). Unless otherwise ordered, by acceptance of the appointment, counsel shall be paid according to the IDP fee schedule in effect at the time of appointment and will be subject to all terms applicable to IDP appointed counsel under the “Attorney Agreement for Legal Services through Conflict Criminal Defenders.” The Conflict Criminal Defenders’ (CCD) Office is hereby appointed to implement these appointments, by selecting the attorney from the IDP and performing the administrative functions CCD previously performed under its Memorandum of Understanding with the Sacramento County Bar Association. This order shall supersede all previous orders by the Court regarding these matters and shall remain in effect until such time as it may be modified or revoked. This order does not prevent the appointment of counsel from other than the IDP where otherwise appropriate in individual cases. DATED: June 10, 2013 THE HONORABLE LAURIE M. EARL Presiding Judge Standing Order of the Superior Court Number: SSC-13-8 Order: Conflict Criminal Defenders’ (CCD) Appointment in Cases Where the Public Defender Declares an Overload [The day of the date, "10", is handwritten. The order bears the seal of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.]
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, JUN 10 2013, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-13-8 ORDER: CONFLICT CRIMINAL DEFENDERS’ (CCD) APPOINTMENT IN CASES WHERE THE PUBLIC DEFENDER DECLARES AN OVERLOAD Effective immediately, in any case in which the Public Defender declines to accept appointment due to ov
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Sacramento build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-sacramento/standing-orders/SSC-13-8.pdf (1126230 bytes, sha256 21f74a6b10421dd7275b1e587adfe8470aca153afc40413c2fca8f012b958ae0; 2 pages), a page scan whose only text is an invisible OCR layer - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; the file's OCR text layer served only as a second reader - every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, the running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.