Loading…
The standing order (dated August 26, 2015; effective August 24, 2015) appointing the Sacramento County Public Defender, on the filing of a petition to revoke post-release community supervision or parole, to represent the supervised person, and the Conflict Criminal Defenders where the Public Defender declines for a legal conflict; it supersedes orders SSC-11-6 and SSC-13-9.
California > Third Appellate District > Sacramento County > Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, AUG 27 2015, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-15-3 APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN PROCEEDINGS ON PETITIONS FOR REVOCATION OF SUPERVISION BY ORDER OF THE COURT AND EFFECTIVE AUGUST 24, 2015, in any case involving a Petition for Revocation of Post-Release Community Supervision or a Petition for Revocation of Parole, immediately upon filing of the petition, the Sacramento County Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent the supervised person. If the Public Defender declines to accept appointment due to legal conflict, pursuant to its authority under Penal Code section 987.2, the Court hereby appoints the Conflict Criminal Defenders. The Conflict Criminal Defenders shall implement the assignment of counsel pursuant to and subject to the Conflict Criminal Defenders’ policies and procedures. This order does not prevent the appointment of counsel other than the Public Defender or the Conflict Criminal Defenders where otherwise appropriate in individual cases. In all such cases, counsel shall agree to and be subject to all Conflict Criminal Defenders’ policies and procedures. This order supersedes the Court’s previous orders, No. SSC-11-6 and No. SSC-13-9, and shall itself remain in effect until further notice or until rescinded, revoked or superseded. DATED: August 26, 2015 THE HONORABLE ROBERT C. HIGHT Presiding Judge Standing Order of the Superior Court Number: SCC-15-3 Appointment of Counsel in Proceedings on Petitions for Revocation of Supervision [The day of the date, "26", is handwritten. The footer prints "SCC-15-3" for SSC-15-3. The order bears the seal of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.]
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, AUG 27 2015, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-15-3 APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN PROCEEDINGS ON PETITIONS FOR REVOCATION OF SUPERVISION BY ORDER OF THE COURT AND EFFECTIVE AUGUST 24, 2015, in any case involving a Petition for Revocation of Post-Release Community Superv
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Sacramento build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-sacramento/standing-orders/SSC-15-3.pdf (270626 bytes, sha256 bf03fef2dfa626e8d52e96b4f46f7b218b707ecfe7fea53cc24b137e1785574b; 2 pages), a page scan whose only text is an invisible OCR layer - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; the file's OCR text layer served only as a second reader - every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, the running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.