Loading…
The standing order of May 3, 2017 setting the court's guiding policy for judicial officers presiding over juvenile justice cases: costs, fees and fines are imposed at the statutory minimum, absent specific circumstances warranting a different amount, within the judicial officer's discretion under California law.
California > Third Appellate District > Sacramento County > Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, MAY -3 2017, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-17-4 ORDER: POLICY FOR IMPOSITION OF ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTION OF COSTS, FEES, AND FINES AGAINST YOUTH IT IS HEREBY THE ORDER OF THIS COURT: The following policy statement shall be forwarded to all Judicial Officers who exercise discretion regarding the possible imposition of assessments and collection costs, fees, and fines against youth involved in the juvenile justice system. Consistent with the customary practice of judicial officers serving in the Sacramento Courts juvenile system and consistent with the California law maintaining judicial discretion, the guiding policy of the Sacramento Superior Court is that judicial officers presiding over juvenile justice cases shall impose costs, fees, and fines at the statutory minimum, absent specific circumstances warranting a different amount, as determined by the judicial officers exercising his or her discretion in accordance with California law. This policy shall remain in effect until such time as it may be modified or revoked. DATED: May 3, 2017 THE HONORABLE KEVIN R. CULHANE Presiding Judge Standing Order of the Superior Court Number: SCC-17-4 Order: Policy for Imposition of Assessments Collection of Costs, Fees, and Fines Against Youth [The day of the date, "3", is handwritten. The footer prints "SCC-17-4" for SSC-17-4. The order bears the seal of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.]
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, MAY -3 2017, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-17-4 ORDER: POLICY FOR IMPOSITION OF ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTION OF COSTS, FEES, AND FINES AGAINST YOUTH IT IS HEREBY THE ORDER OF THIS COURT: The following policy statement shall be forwarded to all Judicial Officers wh
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Sacramento build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-sacramento/standing-orders/SSC-17-4.pdf (228312 bytes, sha256 1c68fd1693c54a44e33c4613025ae383723f503303488dec5dc5f64f49755e36; 2 pages), a page scan whose only text is an invisible OCR layer - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; the file's OCR text layer served only as a second reader - every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, the running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.