Loading…
The standing order of June 21, 2021 assigning all Penal Code § 290.5 petitions under Senate Bill 384 to the Honorable Curtis M. Fiorini and appointing the Sacramento County Public Defender when the petitioner requests counsel; it applies only to petitions concerning convictions in adult court.
California > Third Appellate District > Sacramento County > Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
[File stamp: FILED / ENDORSED, with ENDORSED struck through by hand, JUN 21 2021, By K. Swift, Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-21- 6 ORDER: ASSIGNMENT OF PETITIONS TO TERMINATE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION (PEN. CODE, § 290.5) & APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL BY ORDER OF THE COURT AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, all Penal Code § 290.5 petitions pursuant to Senate Bill 384, shall be assigned to the Honorable Curtis M. Fiorini presiding. Additionally, any petition submitted in which the petitioner requests the appointment of counsel, the Sacramento County Public Defender is hereby appointed. This order does not prevent the appointment of counsel other than the Public Defender where otherwise appropriate in individual cases. This order applies only to petitions that concern convictions in adult court. This order shall remain in effect until such time as it may be modified or revoked. DATED: June 21, 2021 THE HONORABLE RUSSELL HOM Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Standing Order of the Superior Court Number: SCC-21- 6 ORDER: ASSIGNMENT OF PC 290.5 PETITIONS & APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [The "6" of the number in the footer is handwritten. The footer prints "SCC-21- 6" for SSC-21-6. The order bears the seal of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.]
[File stamp: FILED / ENDORSED, with ENDORSED struck through by hand, JUN 21 2021, By K. Swift, Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-21- 6 ORDER: ASSIGNMENT OF PETITIONS TO TERMINATE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION (PEN. CODE, § 290.5) & APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL BY ORDER OF THE COURT AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, all Penal Code
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Sacramento build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-sacramento/standing-orders/SSC-21-6.pdf (128553 bytes, sha256 f191150da6e928116b94ed2b7a804cb13eaa9c0a778cdbc2b9083e81e17ce932; 1 page), a page scan whose only text is an invisible OCR layer - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; the file's OCR text layer served only as a second reader - every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, the running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.