Loading…
The standing order of February 3, 2022 appointing the Sacramento County Public Defender in any felony case before the court for resentencing under Senate Bill 483 (Pen. Code, §§ 1171, 1171.1).
California > Third Appellate District > Sacramento County > Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, FEB -3 2022, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-22-3 ORDER: APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN SENATE BILL 483 RESENTENCING MATTERS BY ORDER OF THE COURT AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, in any felony case before the court for resentencing under Senate Bill 483 (Stats. 2021, ch. 483; Pen. Code, §§ 1171, 1171.1), the Court hereby appoints the Sacramento County Public Defender. This order does not prevent the appointment of counsel other than the Public Defender when appropriate or preclude an individual from retaining their own counsel. This order shall remain in effect until such time as it may be modified or revoked. DATED: February 3, 2022 The Honorable Michael Bowman Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Standing Order of the Superior Court Number: SSC-22-3 Order: Appointment of Counsel in Senate Bill 483 Matters [The order bears the seal of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.]
[File stamp: FILED, COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICE, FEB -3 2022, By: Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-22-3 ORDER: APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN SENATE BILL 483 RESENTENCING MATTERS BY ORDER OF THE COURT AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, in any felony case before the court for resentencing under Senate Bill 483 (Stats. 2021, ch. 48
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Sacramento build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-sacramento/standing-orders/SSC-22-3.pdf (294436 bytes, sha256 15188e41d7314b389c42c495500a0e2b3cb6acbbb139ef995a54788656a2ea27; 1 page), a page scan whose only text is an invisible OCR layer - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; the file's OCR text layer served only as a second reader - every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, the running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.