Loading…
The standing order of April 22, 2022 barring firearms from every Sacramento County courthouse building unless carried by a uniformed officer on official duty; it applies to all local, federal and state law enforcement agencies and officers, does not apply to firearms brought as evidence, allows written exemptions by the Presiding Judge, and supersedes the standing order of December 28, 2001.
California > Third Appellate District > Sacramento County > Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
[File stamp: FILED / ENDORSED, APR 22 2022, By D. Rogers, Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-22-5 ORDER: FIREARM RESTRICTIONS IN COURT FACILITIES IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT: Effective immediately, firearms shall not be brought into any Sacramento County Courthouse building unless carried by a uniformed officer on official duty. This order applies to all local, federal and state law enforcement agencies and officers. This order does not apply to firearms brought to courtrooms as evidence. The Presiding Judge may grant exemptions to this order in writing. This order shall supersede all previous orders by the Court regarding these matters, including the Standing Order issued December 28, 2001, and shall remain in effect until such time as it may be modified or revoked. DATED: 4/22, 2022 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL G. BOWMAN Presiding Judge Standing Order of the Superior Court Number: SSC- 22-5 Order: Firearm Restrictions in Court Facilities [The month and day of the date, "4/22", are handwritten. The order bears the seal of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.]
[File stamp: FILED / ENDORSED, APR 22 2022, By D. Rogers, Deputy Clerk] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-22-5 ORDER: FIREARM RESTRICTIONS IN COURT FACILITIES IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT: Effective immediately, firearms shall not be brought into any Sacramento County Courthouse building unless carried by a uniformed officer
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Sacramento build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-sacramento/standing-orders/SSC-22-5.pdf (291651 bytes, sha256 1caa08c6c66133d621013ee87f41fabba3bed45e02912cd25e010d05c640c302; 1 page), a page scan whose only text is an invisible OCR layer - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; the file's OCR text layer served only as a second reader - every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, the running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.