Loading…
The standing order of February 28, 2025 setting how an action is reassigned when the Felony Home Court judge of Department 61, 62 or 63 is disqualified - by whether the case number ends in an even or odd number - and referring the case to Department 47 when all Felony Home Court judges are disqualified.
California > Third Appellate District > Sacramento County > Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento
[File stamp: FILED / ENDORSED, FEB 28 2025, By Deputy Clerk (the clerk's name is partly covered by handwritten initials)] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-25-4 ORDER: REASSIGNMENT OF FELONY HOME COURT MATTERS IN THE EVENT OF DISQUALIFICATION. IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that in any action assigned to either Department 61, 62, or 63, and the regularly assigned Felony Home Court Judge is thereafter disqualified from the action for any reason, the action shall be assigned to another available Felony Home Court Judge for subsequent proceedings as follows: • Department 61 shall assign cases ending in an even number to Department 62 • Department 61 shall assign cases ending in an odd number to Department 63 • Department 62 shall assign cases ending in an even number to Department 61 • Department 62 shall assign cases ending in an odd number to Department 63 • Department 63 shall assign cases ending in an even number to Department 61 • Department 63 shall assign cases ending in an odd number to Department 62 In the event that all regularly assigned Felony Home Court Judges have been disqualified from a case, the case shall be referred to Department 47 for reassignment purposes. This order shall supersede all previous orders by the Court regarding these matters and shall remain in effect until such time as it may be modified or revoked. DATED: February 28, 2025 THE HONORABLE BUNMI O. AWONIYI Presiding Judge Standing Order of the Superior Court Number: SSC-25-4 Order: Reassignment of Felony Home Court Matters in the Event of Disqualification [The day of the date, "28", is handwritten. The order bears the seal of the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.]
[File stamp: FILED / ENDORSED, FEB 28 2025, By Deputy Clerk (the clerk's name is partly covered by handwritten initials)] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STANDING ORDER OF THE SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT No. SSC-25-4 ORDER: REASSIGNMENT OF FELONY HOME COURT MATTERS IN THE EVENT OF DISQUALIFICATION. IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that in any action assigned to either Department 61, 6
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-02 (California T3 Sacramento build 2026-10-02) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-sacramento/standing-orders/SSC-25-4.pdf (86387 bytes, sha256 b992cdba2f7b7f4ebe078ce4295dc57b1e06c17d8fcef1019b800a888fe84acf; 2 pages), a page scan whose only text is an invisible OCR layer - transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against its image; the file's OCR text layer served only as a second reader - every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten fills in place with a closing bracketed note, the running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.