Loading…
Department 68's advance trial review order: the in-person meet-and-confer before the initial trial call, trial briefs, motions in limine, exhibits and exhibit tags, witness lists, jury instructions and verdict forms, audio and video evidence, and court reporters.
California > Fourth Appellate District > San Diego County > Superior Court of California, County of San Diego > Department 68
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CASE NAME:___________________________ vs. _______________________________ CASE NUMBER:_________________________ ADVANCE TRIAL REVIEW ORDER MADE BY DEPARTMENT 68 ON ____________________ BY THE HONORABLE TERRIE E. ROBERTS Trial counsel for the parties are ordered to meet in person, over the phone, or via video, at least three (3) court days before th
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-28 (California T3 San Diego build) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-san-diego/dept/companion/c19-dept_68_advance_trial_review_order.pdf (400457 bytes, sha256 d3ba35eafc8540d085ffe58734ab7bbcfd597a982879e188914132c04437e7ea; 7 pages) - composed with the shared verbatim composer from the born-digital text layer; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same characters as the text layer minus chrome) both pass. Linked from inside the Department 68 policies document (link text “Dept. 68 Advanced Trial Review Order”). Reflow correction 2026-09-29: 1 line break that fell inside a sentence is joined (whitespace only; the characters are unchanged) - the shared composer now continues a line that ends in a function word, or one followed by a lower-case line across a wide line pitch, and reads “v.” after a name as part of a case name. Spacing correction 2026-09-29: 1 line break inside a sentence joined (a spelled number and its numeral, or a citation); whitespace only, the characters are unchanged.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Verified requirements for Judge Terrie E. Roberts unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →Verified the action checklist unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →