Loading…
For the periodic reviews of conservatorships after the appointment of the conservator, the Clerk serves each conservator to be reviewed, by mail, a written notification approximately 120 days in advance of the review date; each conservator so notified promptly complies with the terms of the Notice of Review, and a conservator who fails to comply is subject to further enforcement proceedings, including contempt; the order takes effect immediately and supersedes Standing Order 05-74.
California > First Appellate District > San Mateo County > Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo
STANDING ORDER 07-85 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO STANDING ORDER RE: COMPLIANCE WITH NOTICE OF REVIEW PROBATE COURT INVESTIGATION DIVISION GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, based on the statutory requirements that a court conducts periodic reviews of all conservatorships after the appointment of the conservator, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Clerk of this court shall, from time to time, provide written notification to conservators in advance of each date set for review and that such notice shall be served by mail on each conservator to be reviewed approximately 120 days in advance of the review date; 2. Each conservator, so notified, shall promptly comply with the terms and provisions of the Notice of Review; 3. Any conservator who fails to comply shall be subject to further enforcement proceedings, including but not limited to adjudication of contempt and punishment; 4. This order shall take effect immediately. 5. Supercedes Standing Order 05-74. This order shall supersede any previous order(s) and shall remain in effect indefinitely and until such time as the order is vacated or superseded by the Presiding Judge. Date: ROBERT D. FOILES, Presiding Judge
STANDING ORDER 07-85 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO STANDING ORDER RE: COMPLIANCE WITH NOTICE OF REVIEW PROBATE COURT INVESTIGATION DIVISION GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, based on the statutory requirements that a court conducts periodic reviews of all conservatorships after the appointment of the conservator, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, A
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-08 (California T4 San Mateo build 2026-10-08) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-san-mateo/docs/07-85.pdf (165678 bytes, sha256 bef981e1cc38a6d6ca920614774731f81db4bdab06960d093689cc9cf6123619; 1 page; a scan, page images, no text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi; checked against three machine readings never published (RapidOCR on each page, the file's own text layer where it has one and RapidOCR on each printed line): every 6-word window of the transcription looked up and each span no reading holds read again on the page image (evidence/vision-check-2026-10-08.log). The clerk's filed stamps, the signatures and the pleading paper's line numbers are not part of the text (a handwritten order number or date, or a stamped name, is carried where it fills the order's own line); the transcription's closing note, which describes them, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.