Motions for inter-county probation transfers under Penal Code § 1203.9 from San Mateo County (notice under California Rules of Court, Rule 4.530) are set for hearing through the Clerk's Office - felony cases on the Criminal Presiding Judge's Calendar, misdemeanor and infraction cases on the Preliminary Hearing calendar; the order supersedes any previous orders on the subject.
California > First Appellate District > San Mateo County > Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo
STANDING ORDER 11-114 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO STANDING ORDER RE: PRESIDING JUDGE’S DESIGNEE TO RECEIVE NOTICE AND DESIGNATION OF HEARING DEPARTMENTS FOR PROBATION TRANSFER REQUESTS [California Rules of Court, Rule 4.530] WHEREAS, California Rules of Court (CRC), Rule 4.530(d) requires either a requesting probation officer of a transferring jurisdiction or party requesting transfer, under Penal Code § 1203.9, to give notice of the motion to transfer probation to persons listed in the Rule; and WHEREAS, CRC, Rule 4.530(1) requires that the notice of the motion to transfer must include the place where the hearing is to be held and the time of the hearing; and WHEREAS, the scope of this Standing Order pertains to setting hearings in the transferring court only; and WHEREAS, in the interest of providing direction to comply with these requirements, this Superior Court makes the following designations: NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that motions for inter-county probation transfers under Penal Code § 1203.9 from San Mateo County are to be set for hearing through the Clerk’s Office as follows: a) For felony cases, on the Criminal Presiding Judge’s Calendar. b) For misdemeanor and infraction cases, on the Preliminary Hearing calendar. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order supersedes any previous order(s) regarding this subject matter and shall remain in effect indefinitely and until such time as the order is vacated or superseded by order of the Presiding Judge. Dated: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman, Presiding Judge
STANDING ORDER 11-114 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO STANDING ORDER RE: PRESIDING JUDGE’S DESIGNEE TO RECEIVE NOTICE AND DESIGNATION OF HEARING DEPARTMENTS FOR PROBATION TRANSFER REQUESTS [California Rules of Court, Rule 4.530] WHEREAS, California Rules of Court (CRC), Rule 4.530(d) requires either a requestin
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-08 (California T4 San Mateo build 2026-10-08) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-san-mateo/docs/11-114.pdf (446099 bytes, sha256 e1715d3bb5183979202651848ba3969405e30727612777ac7bf67674c63140f9; 2 pages; a scan, page images, no text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi; checked against three machine readings never published (RapidOCR on each page, the file's own text layer where it has one and RapidOCR on each printed line): every 6-word window of the transcription looked up and each span no reading holds read again on the page image (evidence/vision-check-2026-10-08.log). The clerk's filed stamps, the signatures and the pleading paper's line numbers are not part of the text (a handwritten order number or date, or a stamped name, is carried where it fills the order's own line); the transcription's closing note, which describes them, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.